![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Regrets if this gets posted twice. The first time,
it seemed to disappear into bit-space.) I don't know the answer to the original question, but I'm interestd to learn the answer(s). Interesting the FAA requires a flight of 50nm and a landing away from the originating field to be considered 'XC.' In a glider, if you get more than one thermal away from home field, you're 'XC.' While I do want to know the answer, I wonder why the original poster of this thread would want to 'cut short' his 'training' time. Yes, he will save money on flying before he gets his rating, but he's going to spend the money anyway after he gets his rating, so overall, I don't see a money savings. It's odd that we do all we can do to fly as many hours as we can, gaining experience, having fun, and seeing new sights with each additional moment in the air. Then, we look for ways to make our flying time shorter. I read about and hear about pilots complaining about diversions dictated by Air Traffic Control and I wonder why the complaint. Yes, I know it's more money, but heck, we're going to have to pay to fly anyway. On one VFR flight in a Cezzna 150, the controller vectored me around the Class C airport I was approaching to land due to traffic. He apologized for the diversion, but I thought it was great. I flew over land I hadn't been over and got some addtional flying time. Didn't bother me a bit. Yep, some of us want to build time and some of us complain when we have to fly more than we think we should. What does it take to make us happy? (I'll settle for a 0.5 knot thermal about right now :-) ) Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA (Facing a long winter, and no wise cracks from the Northern Plains crowd about the 'long' North Carolina winters...) At 06:30 24 November 2004, Tom Seim wrote: (Matt Michael) wrote in message news:... I'm trying to determine if any of my glider cross-country time can be applied to the commercial single engine aeronautical experience requirements. FAR 61.129 says '50 hours of cross-country flight of which at least 10 hours must be in airplanes'. FAR 61.1 defines cross country time as, among other things, flight with landing beyond 50 nautical miles of departure and 'conducted in an appropriate aircraft'. I've talked to a local examiner, FSDO, and Oklahoma City. All are saying, 'Hmmm, good question! Let me get back to you'. Anyone with experience with this question care to weigh in? Thanks, Matt Michael CFIG Woodstock N20609 'Wanders Wonder' IS-28B2 Lark N28DG I have done exactly this. The bottom line is that you CAN use your glider XC time, IF you land more than 50 NM from departure. This saved me about one half of the flight time. Nowadays, that is 25 times $70 per hour = $1,750. Tom |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 11:46 PM |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 10:45 PM |
| Cross country in the 1-34 | mat Redsell | Soaring | 3 | October 22nd 04 05:56 PM |
| Cross Country the main focus of soaring? | mat Redsell | Soaring | 77 | October 18th 04 11:40 PM |
| US cross country flight | S Narayan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 7th 04 03:58 PM |