![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:41:35 -0600, Mark Smith wrote: :You can't train in experimental homebuilt, you knew this I'm sure Sure you can. Go read the link, that's why I included it. You can't give students their primary training in one, you have to be a CFI, you have to be a member of EAA. You want to give students a multi engine or seaplane rating? Not a problem. You want to transition them into something like a Quicksilver, that flies much more on rudder than ailerons? Not a problem. Read this one: http://www.avweb.com/news/homeblts/182021-1.html Of course, if you're NOT a CFI and you want to train ab-initio students, then sadly in 5 years you won't be able to. Me, I think that's a small price to pay for 1) keeping the original 103 structure and 2) getting a whole new class of aircraft with achievable certification requirements and 3) getting a new class of pilot's privileges that you can self certify medicals for. For the most part, private pilots think they already know how to fly ultralights. And for the most part, they have proven themselves wrong for over twenty years. A PPL isn't Gods gift to the world of flying, it is more paperwork than flying. that's why they are called pilots not flyers ! And most of the folks who show up at my field to learn to fly uls don't have a PPL so basic training is out. And you DID know that ! At least from your rant it seems like you say that somehwre. With all the hoopla you confused the issue from me using my plane to teach folks to fly. I could continue to give thousands to an Org that screwed me, but i choose to NOT do that. I could continue as a BFI for some few years. I Choose to not do that. I've taught my share of students as I felt I owed the sport the safety afforded by having training available. the FnAA has seen fit to dismantle this time tested and proven system overnight. I really don't even refer to flying uls as a sport anymore due to the use of the word sport. Just as Osh Kosh will always be called Osh Kosh to me, and never aer venture, ever. Course i quit going there many years ago after getting sick on the food, prices, lack of showers, etc. I don't want to be a CFI, even if they drove to my house and gave me the cert. I've seen how their system works, or doesn't as the case may be, and don't want to be any part of it. -- Mark Smith Tri-State Kite Sales 1121 N Locust St Mt Vernon, IN 47620 1-812-838-6351 http://www.trikite.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Smith wrote:
Richard Riley wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:41:35 -0600, Mark Smith wrote: :You can't train in experimental homebuilt, you knew this I'm sure Sure you can. Go read the link, that's why I included it. You can't give students their primary training in one, you have to be a CFI, you have to be a member of EAA. You want to give students a multi engine or seaplane rating? Not a problem. You want to transition them into something like a Quicksilver, that flies much more on rudder than ailerons? Not a problem. Read this one: http://www.avweb.com/news/homeblts/182021-1.html Of course, if you're NOT a CFI and you want to train ab-initio students, then sadly in 5 years you won't be able to. Me, I think that's a small price to pay for 1) keeping the original 103 structure and 2) getting a whole new class of aircraft with achievable certification requirements and 3) getting a new class of pilot's privileges that you can self certify medicals for. For the most part, private pilots think they already know how to fly ultralights. And for the most part, they have proven themselves wrong for over twenty years. A PPL isn't Gods gift to the world of flying, it is more paperwork than flying. that's why they are called pilots not flyers ! Talk about someone being stuck on themselves, and you think your Gods gift to flying. I very definely disagree with your assessment of PPL, Do you really think I spent 60 hours flying in airplanes just riding around doing nothing? It's about time you got a life! I'm sure you think since your so heavy into UL's that you can just hop in a plane and fly it also. Mark your posting this to RAH (along with RAU) the majority of the people on this board are pilots flying airplanes. How bout giving a little respect instead of demeaning others because of your loss of business! John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "UltraJohn" wrote Mark your posting this to RAH (along with RAU) the majority of the people on this board are pilots flying airplanes. How bout giving a little respect instead of demeaning others because of your loss of business! John He doesn't matter to me anymore, and he won't bother me anymore. Bye, Mark. plonk -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Self fly hire in the US | Nigel | Piloting | 25 | March 28th 04 09:20 AM |
Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 03 05:21 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |