![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm looking, and admit I'm intrigued, though my gut feeling is that this
may be an aircraft that I might just not be completely happy with. I plan on quite likely flying what I build for a very long time (I'm 34), so I want to build exactly what I want. But thanks, as I wasn't aware of this design. P.S. Back when I was looking for a two-seater I did consider the XL, but rejected it in favor of an RV as a, well, just all-around better airplane (with far better performance). But while an XL is really no cheaper to build than an RV-9, the 640 does offer the big advantage (as I see it) over the RV-10 as accepting a 4-cyl engine and FP prop. Paul Dow wrote: I haven't seen the Zenith CH-640 mentioned in this thread yet. www.zenair.com As you proabaly know, every plane is the result of comprimises. The base price is $24,800, $35,190 for quick build. About the only comprimize from your point would be to replace your knot specification with MPH. Takeoff roll is listed at 990 ft. at gross. It would be nice if it had more modern looking cooling inlets, but other than those items it looks like something you may want to consider. Paul Folbrecht wrote: Jean-Paul, Really just not what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for a STOL aircraft. The 801 is too slow. Have you had a look at the Zenith CH-801. Great plane, easy to built and cheap compared to the RV's. Just an opinion |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|