|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
March 16th 05, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yep, that's what Assistant Secretary Young said. But what's the risk of
totally redesigning the EH101 structure to meet modern crash strength requirements? What's the risk of setting up a Presidential manufacturing and support mechanism offshore? If they both needed rotor and drivetrain changes, the risk is in air vehicle development, and I think they minimized the risk for Lockheed Martin. Take a look at the BBC picture of the Merlin flattened after a crash from a 20 ft hover and ask yourself where the risk is. HW 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 11 | February 8th 05 03:20 PM |
| Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | January 30th 05 04:48 AM |
| Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 06:24 AM |
| Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 10:11 AM |
| Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 0 | February 25th 04 07:39 PM |
Threaded Mode