![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: In article . com, Harry K says... FYI for anyone interested. From the Spokesman Review, Spokane Wa 03/27/05 (excerpts, with editing, of article follow) Spokane Men killed in Ultralight crash Two Spokane men were killed when an ultralight plane crashed less than 200 yards from Interstate 84 in Eastern Oregon. A minor clairifaction it was an Amatuer Built experimental 2 Place challenger calling it an U/L is a common mistake. See ya Chuck S I wondered about that. Seeing 52 hp and ultralight and ref to 2 people in the same description set off warning bells. Oddly, a google search of 'ultralight airplane challenger II' returns many hits with ultralight in the title. Harry K |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry K wrote:
I wondered about that. Seeing 52 hp and ultralight and ref to 2 people in the same description set off warning bells. Oddly, a google search of 'ultralight airplane challenger II' returns many hits with ultralight in the title. They may be Canadian aircraft. See: http://www.challenger.ca/faq.html The article implies that the Canadian CAA has a different definition of "Ultralight" than the US's FAA. -Luke |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luke Scharf" wrote in message ... Harry K wrote: I wondered about that. Seeing 52 hp and ultralight and ref to 2 people in the same description set off warning bells. Oddly, a google search of 'ultralight airplane challenger II' returns many hits with ultralight in the title. They may be Canadian aircraft. See: http://www.challenger.ca/faq.html The article implies that the Canadian CAA has a different definition of "Ultralight" than the US's FAA. -Luke Also, don't forget that you can take a 2 seat ultralight, or for that matter, a 1 seat ultralight, and if it meets the 51% rule of owner assembled work, you can register it as amateur experimental, and put N numbers on it. It then does not have to meet the ultralight rules of 5 gallons of fuel, weight, speed, where it can fly, training flights only, ect. Probably the legal way to do it, anyway, in the case of 2 seat "ultralights." -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fighter Ultralight Website | Kevin Berlyn | Home Built | 0 | December 27th 04 10:11 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Looking for Oregon maint. shop recommendations | [email protected] | Owning | 2 | February 16th 04 02:40 AM |
Ultralight magazine August 1981 | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | July 20th 03 04:34 AM |
Central Oregon Soaring? | aerocomposites | Soaring | 3 | July 16th 03 08:15 PM |