![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Grumman-581" wrote in
news:gzK2e.121325$Ze3.94841@attbi_s51: "Roger" wrote in message ... That name is aparently used by so many anomyous and disagreeable posters it comes out as guilty by association even before people read what is said. Agreed... If you do a search on Google Groups for the posts by that name, you get quite a few, but there has been significantly more because they set the X-Archive to 'no'... No only are they to cowardly to say what they say with something that might be traceable, they don't have the balls to let it stay around in the archives for posterity... I figure that if it was worth saying the first time, you shouldn't mind it staying around forever... I guess it would kind of be like someone who says they wear a white sheet and hood because it is comfortable and it doesn't matter that the only other people wearing that is the KKK... Sorry, but you're guilty by association... I've encountered anonymous remailer individuals on other newsgroups and they have always been trolls... There is no way that they would have the balls to say what they say in person... That may be different with the individual who is using it on this group, but I guess I won't get a chance to find out because I killfile the domains of the anonymous remailers regardless of whether I agree with the poster or not... It's possible that the person who is using the remailer on this newsgroup is simply misguided... Since he has X-Archive set to 'no', it's not like I could look back in the archives to see if he actually is a reasonable (albeit misguided) person... I know I'm relatively new to this group, mostly lurking and having posted only a few times, but this sub-thread has really caught my attention and would like to offer some observations. For one thing, I know of some folks in other newsgroups that I participate in that post anonymously and they are far from being trolls. Why they chose to post anonymously is their own business. But they are good contributors to those groups. Besides, in my personal experience anyway, I encounter more trolls that use real (or fake) email addresses than those who post anonymously. Filtering anonymous remailers may nuke a few unwanted messages but it may also nuke some good legit messages. What about all the other trolls that don't use anonymous remailers? I also can't help but notice there are more posts in this thread complaining about anonymous posters, about ignoring them, and why they are bad than there are actual anonymous posts. Lastly, there are very legitimate uses of anonymous remailers and mail-to-news gateways. I have used them on occasion myself. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy Home of the Seismic FAQ http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Continental IO-520A operating data? | Michael | Owning | 7 | November 26th 04 09:38 PM |
| Australia only Continental 0-200 or 0-240 | Robert | Home Built | 0 | May 20th 04 05:07 AM |
| looking for a baggage door handle for a Baron/Bonanza | Baron Man | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 09:38 PM |
| Continental 0-200 | Robert | Home Built | 0 | April 3rd 04 04:08 AM |
| Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article | John B. | Piloting | 40 | October 21st 03 05:07 PM |