![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
A little testy today, are we? Forget to take your meds?
Forgive my assumption that because you referred to Part 25 you also had access to Part 23. Herewith the relevant sections: "§ 23.63 Climb: general. (a) Compliance with the requirements of §§ 23.65, 23.66, 23.67, 23.69, and 23.77 must be shown - (1) Out of ground effect; and (2) At speeds that are not less than those at which compliance with the powerplant cooling requirements of §§ 23.1041 to 23.1047 has been demonstrated; and (3) Unless otherwise specified, with one engine inoperative, at a bank angle not exceeding 5 degrees. (b) For normal, utility, and acrobatic category reciprocating engine powered airplanes of 6,000 pounds or less maximum weight, compliance must be shown with § 23.65(a), § 23.67(a), where appropriate, and § 23.77(a) at maximum takeoff or landing weight, as appropriate, in a standard atmosphere. (c) For normal, utility, and acrobatic category reciprocating engine powered airplanes of more than 6,000 pounds maximum weight, and turbine engine powered airplanes in the normal, utility, and acrobatic category, compliance must be shown at weights as a function of airport altitude and ambient temperature, within the operational limits established for takeoff and landing, respectively, with - (1) Sections 23.65(b) and 23.67(b) (1) and (2), where appropriate, for takeoff, and (2) Section 23.67(b)(2), where appropriate, and § 23.77(b), for landing. (d) For commuter category airplanes, compliance must be shown at weights as a function of airport altitude and ambient temperature within the operational limits established for takeoff and landing, respectively, with - (1) Sections 23.67(c)(1), 23.67(c)(2), and 23.67(c)(3) for takeoff; and (2) Sections 23.67(c)(3), 23.67(c)(4), and 23.77(c) for landing. [Amdt. 23-50, 61 FR 5186, Feb. 9, 1996] § 23.65 Climb: All engines operating. (a) Each normal, utility, and acrobatic category reciprocating engine powered airplane of 6,000 pounds or less maximum weight must have a steady climb gradient at sea level of at least 8.3 percent for landplanes or 6.7 percent for seaplanes and amphibians with - (1) Not more than maximum continuous power on each engine; (2) The landing gear retracted; (3) The wing flaps in the takeoff position(s); and (4) A climb speed not less than the greater of 1.1 VMC and 1.2 VS1 for multiengine airplanes and not less than 1.2 VS1 for single engine airplanes. (b) Each normal, utility, and acrobatic category reciprocating engine powered airplane of more than 6,000 pounds maximum weight and turbine engine powered airplanes in the normal, utility, and acrobatic category must have a steady gradient of climb after takeoff of at least 4 percent with (1) Take off power on each engine; (2) The landing gear extended, except that if the landing gear can be retracted in not more than seven seconds, the test may be conducted with the gear retracted; (3) The wing flaps in the takeoff position(s); and (4) A climb speed as specified in § 23.65(a)(4)." As noted by others, VFR/IFR does not enter into the discussion. Bob Gardner "Sparse" wrote in message oups.com... Up yours Bob Gardner wrote: It's a Gardner time-honored tradition...answer first, then research. 23.65 is the appropriate reg, and there are prescribed climb gradients for airplanes with one, two, three, or four engines. As Damon Runyan wrote, you could look it up. Bob "Sparse" wrote in message ups.com... Does anyone know of a VFR climb gradient. The only possible thing I can come up with is what Part 25 says an aircraft must be able to meet concerning the takeoff path. From the start of takeoff to 1500 feet or when transition from takeoff to enroute configuration is complete. an aircraft must be able to climb at least at a 1.2% gradeitn. I ahev heard of a gradeint of 1.6% for VFR but I acn find nothing about it. I know the IFR gradient is 3.3%. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 11:01 PM |
| Second Stage Climb Gradient? | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 15th 03 07:41 PM |
| Second Stage Climb Gradient? | Bill | Piloting | 10 | September 15th 03 07:41 PM |
| 172 N Climb Performance | Roger Long | Piloting | 6 | September 11th 03 12:18 AM |
| More About Leaning During Climb | Dan Luke | Owning | 13 | July 11th 03 03:36 PM |