Experimental or not?

On 5 Apr 2005 14:36:01 -0700, (John D. Abrahms)
wrote:

There are more than one category of Experimental aircraft.

Experimental - Amateur built
Experimental - Exhibition
Experimental - Racing
Experimental - Research & Development

There are a couple (?) more that I can't recall at the moment..

The L-39 falls under Experimental Exhibition, principally, because
there is no FAA type-certificate for the machine. The Antonov AN-2
is another example of this, as are Canadian-built Harvard (T-6)
aircraft. Basically, the manufacturers of these aircraft have not
done what it takes to prove to the FAA that the design complies
with the FAA regulations which cover standard category aircraft.

I'm not an L-39 expert by any means, but it's unlikely (?) you'll find
one registered as a standard category airframe. The LOA for
a turbine powered aircraft is what's driving the 1000 hours PIC
time. You don't need 1000 PIC to fly an experimental aircraft
in general.

Bela P. Havasreti

Hello!

I'm reading here for a while now, but today I want to come up with a
question that bothered me for a while. I'm not a pilot (but will begin
to take flight lessons soon) so this is mostly out of curiosity.

I know that all the airplanes that people build by themselves fall
into the experimental category, because they are not factory-made,
serialized products but individually built with different quality and
with different modifications. I also know that GA airplanes made of
composites usually fall into the experimental class category, too.
What really annoyed me is that there also are planes that are not
composite and also are factory-made in high numbers that fall into
experiemnat category, like the Aero L-39 Jet airplane. I now wonder
why it's treated as experimental, and not as a normal aircplane,
utility aircraft or aerobatic airplane. Why is this the case? What
makes a jet airplane that is produced by a factory in high numbers
different than say a C-152 that also is produced by a factory in high
numbers? Is the only way to register jet airplanes like the L-39 the
experimental category? Or can they also be registered as say aerobatic
aircraft?

From what I know a pilot who wants to fly a L-39 jet airplane needs
1000hrs of PIC time, and after that needs a Letter of Authorization to
be able to fly the L-39. What if the L-39 would not be registered as
experimental but as normal/utility/aerobatic airplane? Would this also
require 1000hrs of PIC time before someone can fly with this L-39? Are
there any PIC hours required to be allowed to fly turbine airplanes?
Or are the 1000hrs required for experimental airplanes in general?

I also heard that it's not possible to use an experimental plane for
training (PPL, CPL, IFR, whatever). Is that true? If so, registering
airplanes like an L-39 in normal/utility/aerobatic category would
probably also remove some limitations like the use for training,
right? So why are they registered as experimental instead?

As I said, it's just curiosity. But it really confuses me.

JJ