![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I understand your enthusiasm about EA-18G ;-) - it could be called an
"F/A-18F Plus" rather than "EA-6B replacement". First version of the story was that EA-18G was incapable of carrying AIM-9X (having wingtips EW pods permanently attached), but now appears it can do anything F/A-18F can do, plus missions requiring dedicated electronic warfare equipment not available in F version. That would be a plane for every day of the war - from the start, when jamming, recce, SEAD/time-critical strike missions are especially important, until the later phase, when it could support F/A-18E/F on tanker, strike, or fighter duties. It could also act as a Forward Air Controller (Airborne) or UAV control platform. The only question is: will it be as effective jammer as Prowler is? Best regards, Jacek |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RAF Hampdens question on paint scheme | Ian | Military Aviation | 9 | August 20th 04 09:30 PM |
| RAF Hampdens: question on paint scheme | Ian | Military Aviation | 1 | August 16th 04 11:34 PM |
| RAF Hampdens: question on paint scheme | Ian | Military Aviation | 0 | August 16th 04 07:12 AM |
| RAF Hampdens: question on paint scheme | Ian | Restoration | 0 | August 16th 04 07:12 AM |
| Velocity Paint scheme | Ezaviator | Home Built | 0 | July 31st 03 05:09 AM |