A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pressure Washer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 29th 05, 11:14 PM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Water pressure is a matter of height/elevation. From my fire department
days, you will get static pressure of 1/2" pound PSI per foot of
elevation.. so you need 10 feet of water to get that 20 psi.

You've got approx 1.5 psi there of head pressure.

Considering you will be flowing very little in the way of gallons per
minute, I wont address the flow related pressure loss in that 5/8" hose.

Chances are you will actually do just fine.. If not, then you need to
"make" a tank that can handle pressure (such as a large air compressor's
tank.. coat it for rust proofing, and put an air nipple on it and charge
it to 20 psi.. which is prolly overkill in my opinion.. people have
pressure washers in the back of trailers all the time with a feed tank
right next to it, running atmospheric pressure feeds.

Dave

Newps wrote:

Got a new pressure washer today and I want to bring it to the airport to
wash the plane. It needs 20 psi to work properly. If I put a 100
gallon water tank in my truck and fed the pressure washer with a
standard 5/8" garden hose and a 3 foot drop to the pressure washer on
the ground would that give me 20 psi?


  #2  
Old April 30th 05, 03:26 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave S wrote:
Water pressure is a matter of height/elevation. From my fire department
days, you will get static pressure of 1/2" pound PSI per foot of
elevation.. so you need 10 feet of water to get that 20 psi.


Wouldn't that be 40' of elevation to get 20 psi?

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
  #3  
Old April 30th 05, 04:14 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes.. you are absolutely right.. and someone else earlier gave the more
exact value of 0.4 psi/ft so actually its more like 50 feet. I had the
right idea but did the wrong math the first time around.

Think about it like this.. most water towers are in the 100 ft range to
get spigot pressures of 40-50 psi. Modern practice is now to get away
from towers and stick with continuous duty pumps, but the old style
still persists.

Dave

Thanks.

George Patterson wrote:
Dave S wrote:

Water pressure is a matter of height/elevation. From my fire
department days, you will get static pressure of 1/2" pound PSI per
foot of elevation.. so you need 10 feet of water to get that 20 psi.



Wouldn't that be 40' of elevation to get 20 psi?

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.


  #4  
Old April 30th 05, 03:55 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:14:38 GMT, Dave S
wrote:

Think about it like this.. most water towers are in the 100 ft range to
get spigot pressures of 40-50 psi. Modern practice is now to get away
from towers and stick with continuous duty pumps, but the old style
still persists.


Really? This surprises me. Water towers offer a lot of benefits.

Water towers allow the purchase of smaller pumps, that will serve the
average water flow through the day, vs. peak rate. That saves initial
capital cost.

Water towers are sized to provide a day or so of water to the
community in the event that the pump breaks or power is interrupted.

Last, space on water towers are now leased to cellular carriers, so
the towers actually provide a revenue stream for the city.

OTOH, it probably costs a fair amount of money to build a water tower,
so the capital costs may outweight the benefits. Although for what
the cell carriers pay for leases, I'd be surprised if it didn't cover
the mortgage/bond on the water tower.
  #5  
Old April 30th 05, 05:50 PM
houstondan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Nathan Young wrote:
((snip))
Really? This surprises me. Water towers offer a lot of benefits.


((snip))


american water works assn and most states still consider elevated water
best, ground tank on a hill works fine, but the costs for maintenance,
worker and community issues get pretty rough. the real issues are
firefighting with a dead electric grid and keeping the system
pressurized for health issues. sometimes, if you're clever, you can
get/stay certified with ground storage only by strapping in enough big
deisel generators to keep the pressure up.

personally, i like having lots of water towers with place names on them
as an easy and reasuring answer to the question "where the heck am i??"
although often as not the city name is covered with spray paint
announcing that sally did tommy which isn't much help unless you happen
to know sally. hence the aforementioned maintenance issue.


dan

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 07:35 PM
Attn: Hydraulic experts - oil pressure relief fix? MikeremlaP Home Built 0 November 2nd 04 05:49 PM
Cabin Pressure Altitude Greg Esres Piloting 4 March 24th 04 08:35 PM
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance [email protected] Owning 5 July 22nd 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.