![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can lean to that fuel flow without any undue engine sounds, too.
But my EGTs go well over 1500 degrees, and my CHTs push 350 when I do. I would rather burn a bit more gas. [...] OK, but that brings into doubt your assertion about your fueling style being a big cost savings, doesn't it? Using 25% more fuel at 70% of the cost per unit volume is only about a 10% savings. Or maybe you didn't lean aggressively on avgas either? Right -- I leaned no differently with avgas. A cooler running engine will, all other things being equal, last longer. I *can* lean a lot more, push my EGTs over 1500 degrees, push my CHTs to 350+ degrees, save some gas -- and risk my new engine. Now, of course, there are many theories on leaning (I've read 'em all), but with my normally aspirated engine having such (relatively) unbalanced fuel flow to each cylinder, I don't feel comfortable aggressively leaning. If I had fuel injected, balanced-flow GAMI-jectors, I'd be singing a different tune. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 82 | May 19th 05 03:49 PM |