![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... Matt Barrow wrote: wrote in message ups.com... In the instant case, it is not feasible for private concerns to operate the weather bureau infrastructure, inclusing constellations of weather satellites and so on. Oh, like the constellation of communications satellites? And the broadcast groups? How many of those were put into orbit by privately developed and operated launch vehicles? Every one of them. NASA has no manufacturing capacity of it own. There is also a need for consistant (preferably high) quality and availabllity from the standpoint of public saftey. So you rely on government bureaucrats to provide that? Yes and they do. LOL!! Boy are you easily satisfied. Good little menchen, you! These are much the same people as run the Postal Disservice and Amtrak. Unhappy with the USPS are you? It has already been privatized. Man, you're nievity is incredible. Here the story a while back about the USPS fining people for carrying first class mail? How much do UPS and FedEx pay in income taxes? In property taxes? Privitized? Like AMTRAK? Like I said: get a clue! IMHO, service was far more consistant and consistantly good when there was a Postmaster General in the Cabinet. Yup. They took decades to convert to faster means of transport that UPS and FexEx had from day ONE. In essence, the old Post Office didn't evolve during it's first 170 years of existence. The comparison is not the Post Office and the modern day USPS, it's FedEx, UPS, and a slew of local delivery services/ Amtrak could not compete with the heavily subsidized airline industry regardless of who managed it. Want to compare subsidies for the airlines versus Amtrak? The proposal would not significantly reduce the government's costs, but would significantly reduce the public benefit. Not good. Yeah..corporations give us all our comforts and prosperity, but they could do that. Get a clue!! I'm not able to parse that, But riddle me this, is the market for weather reporting more lucrative in heavily populated areas or in sparsley populated areas? Which of those two are the preferred areas for GA? Non-sequitur -- the market is nation wide. Again, get a clue rather than the bilge the media and your handlers shoved down your throat and which you uncritically swallowed. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| They are trying to remove your weather access | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 34 | June 29th 05 11:31 PM |
| Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Home Built | 61 | May 16th 05 10:31 PM |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 11:46 PM |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 10:45 PM |
| millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 6th 04 12:14 AM |