![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
... Sport Pilot wrote: Most flat fours are not a boxer, and many twins are not. A boxer engine will weigh and cost more. It's not really needed on a flat four anyway, as on a non boxer the pistons on the front and rear pair will be going opposite directions True, but this doesn introduce a "rocking couple" vibration mode. There's no free lunch WRT to engine design. :-) Although some configurations come close (I-6, V-8, etc.) Matt A very interesting design is the Diesel Air engine (www.dair.co.uk). They have two pistons per cylinder, moving in opposite directions. The ignition happens in the center of the cylinder, which is also the center of the engine. All forces that can cause vibration are supposed to cancel eachother out, so there's a minimum of vibration. The engine has two cranks which are mechanically coupled on the outside to bundle the power to the prop. Pictures are on their site. Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob Turk"
sednews:xmXie.4098$184.3491@amstwist00: "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Sport Pilot wrote: Most flat fours are not a boxer, and many twins are not. A boxer engine will weigh and cost more. It's not really needed on a flat four anyway, as on a non boxer the pistons on the front and rear pair will be going opposite directions True, but this doesn introduce a "rocking couple" vibration mode. There's no free lunch WRT to engine design. :-) Although some configurations come close (I-6, V-8, etc.) Matt A very interesting design is the Diesel Air engine (www.dair.co.uk). They have two pistons per cylinder, moving in opposite directions. The ignition happens in the center of the cylinder, which is also the center of the engine. All forces that can cause vibration are supposed to cancel eachother out, so there's a minimum of vibration. The engine has two cranks which are mechanically coupled on the outside to bundle the power to the prop. Pictures are on their site. A fairly old idea, but it was quite successful for the Germans in WW2, the engine giving a good SFC and allowing long range maritime patrols. I've seen a sectioned example of this engine up close and it's fairly complicated, not to mention absolutely huge! http://www.billzilla.org/ideas4.htm But it goes back even further than that, at least to 1898 when the Arrol Johnston company made that same design into this contraption. http://www.britishmm.co.uk/history.asp?id=65 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Rob Turk" sednews:xmXie.4098$184.3491@amstwist00: "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Sport Pilot wrote: Most flat fours are not a boxer, and many twins are not. A boxer engine will weigh and cost more. It's not really needed on a flat four anyway, as on a non boxer the pistons on the front and rear pair will be going opposite directions True, but this doesn introduce a "rocking couple" vibration mode. There's no free lunch WRT to engine design. :-) Although some configurations come close (I-6, V-8, etc.) Matt A very interesting design is the Diesel Air engine (www.dair.co.uk). They have two pistons per cylinder, moving in opposite directions. The ignition happens in the center of the cylinder, which is also the center of the engine. All forces that can cause vibration are supposed to cancel eachother out, so there's a minimum of vibration. The engine has two cranks which are mechanically coupled on the outside to bundle the power to the prop. Pictures are on their site. A fairly old idea, but it was quite successful for the Germans in WW2, the engine giving a good SFC and allowing long range maritime patrols. I've seen a sectioned example of this engine up close and it's fairly complicated, not to mention absolutely huge! http://www.billzilla.org/ideas4.htm But it goes back even further than that, at least to 1898 when the Arrol Johnston company made that same design into this contraption. http://www.britishmm.co.uk/history.asp?id=65 Opposed piston (not opposed cylinder) engines of the diesel persuasion are very close to an ideal concept. Junkers engine division JUMO used the concept in their pre WWII 200 series. Fairbanks Morse in the US used the concept for diesel submarines and later diesel locomotives. The Russians used them in their tanks and the British developed the incredible three crankshaft, 18 cylinder, 36 piston Deltec. Diesel Air Ltd. has updated the concept in their very cool light aircraft engine. These are all two-stroke direct injection diesels with intake and exhaust ports at the ends of the pistons stroke. One piston uncovers the intake ports and the opposing piston uncovers the exhaust ports so there is a 'uni-flow' scavenging effect. The cranks for the opposing pistons are out of phase by about 20 degrees so the exhaust port opens first but closes before the intake port does. This allows true supercharging of the cylinder. There are neither cylinder heads nor valves to leak or cool. The whole cylinder is bathed in coolant. I wish all the diesel aircraft engine developers the best of luck. Their day has come. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rob Turk wrote: "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Sport Pilot wrote: Most flat fours are not a boxer, and many twins are not. A boxer engine will weigh and cost more. It's not really needed on a flat four anyway, as on a non boxer the pistons on the front and rear pair will be going opposite directions True, but this doesn introduce a "rocking couple" vibration mode. There's no free lunch WRT to engine design. :-) Although some configurations come close (I-6, V-8, etc.) Matt A very interesting design is the Diesel Air engine (www.dair.co.uk). They have two pistons per cylinder, moving in opposite directions. The ignition happens in the center of the cylinder, which is also the center of the engine. All forces that can cause vibration are supposed to cancel eachother out, so there's a minimum of vibration. The engine has two cranks which are mechanically coupled on the outside to bundle the power to the prop. Pictures are on their site. Rob Two pistons per cylinder, one piston and two cylinders, etc. It has been done before. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Piloting | 1 | September 25th 04 07:13 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |