![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mark,
I'm a CFI here in the states. I use the Transport Canada program, modified a bit to reflect the needs of the US FAA, with most of my 'independent' students. Most CFIs in the US have a fairly wide latitude to tailor their instruction to the individual needs of the students. The 'objective' standards required to earn the US Private Pilot are outlined in the FAA's 'Practical Test Standards' (PTS), which describes the competency level, tolerences, and manevuers the candidate will be tested on. The FAA knowledge test is very well known, and almost all CFIs know what level of knowledge is required to pass the test, so we try to teach that at a very minimum; it really isn't enough, butb many of us see that as a minimum starting point. Many flight schools have 'standardized' curricula, and there are several published ones available from different sources. Generally, regardless of the specific curricula used (including 'home-rolled' ones created by independent CFIs), the progress and transition scheme is the same: Basic straight/level flight, then turns/climbs, then stalls, then manevuers, etc.... But CFIs are highly trained professionals. We have to use our professional knowledge to modify and adopt *any* syllabus or program to the individual student; it's virtually impossible to say "During lesson 4, every student will exhibit a knowledge of Power-On stalls...." Student performance varies widely. I have had students who picked up normal landings in a single lesson. I have had others who took 5 or 6 lessons to get to the same point. Was the former the 'better' pilot? Actually no. He just got to a certain point faster. But I would have served *neither* student well, if I blindly adhered to a schedule that made the first student spend 3 hours on something he had mstered in 1, and allowed the second student only 3 hours for something he needed six for. Most CFIs have a plan for the progress of their students. We know what skills they need, and how to tach them those skills. But we also know that flexibility is one of the most vital attributes of both pilots and instructors. So, I guess the answer to your question is 'sort-of'. ![]() Cheers, Cap |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 03:20 AM |
| Student-Instructor question (USA) | Nolaminar | Soaring | 18 | December 1st 03 07:25 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |
| Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 07:44 AM |