A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

hey guynoir



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 05, 05:33 AM
Stealth Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default hey guynoir


I had my closest simulation of flight in a quickie q1 yesterday.

out doing a bienniel flight review in what I thought was a schmick
cessna 150 aerobat.
at 3,000ft we were climbing for altitude for a practise spin and we
sat there cruising along with full rpm at best climb speed and
attitude for 20 minutes without the altimeter moving a gnats whisker.
the mind strays in such situations and I couldnt help thinking that I
was at a safe altitude experiencing the same sort of agony that some
Q1 builders have related to me about takeoffs with the smaller onan
engine.
talk about managing limited resources and praying for thermals!

is there a better engine for the Q1 than the onans?
Stealth Pilot




  #2  
Old May 26th 05, 06:18 AM
Ed Sullivan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 12:33:44 +0800, Stealth Pilot
wrote:


I had my closest simulation of flight in a quickie q1 yesterday.

out doing a bienniel flight review in what I thought was a schmick
cessna 150 aerobat.
at 3,000ft we were climbing for altitude for a practise spin and we
sat there cruising along with full rpm at best climb speed and
attitude for 20 minutes without the altimeter moving a gnats whisker.
the mind strays in such situations and I couldnt help thinking that I
was at a safe altitude experiencing the same sort of agony that some
Q1 builders have related to me about takeoffs with the smaller onan
engine.
talk about managing limited resources and praying for thermals!

is there a better engine for the Q1 than the onans?
Stealth Pilot


Actually I found the Q1 to be a pretty lively performer on such
limited power. A friend of mine put a Kawasaki in his, but I liked it
better with the Onan.
The only problem was that Onans loved to die.

Ed Sullivan test pilot of hundreds of aircraft, well 4 or 5 anyway!
If zoom can say it why can't I.



  #3  
Old May 26th 05, 07:10 AM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 22:18:28 -0700, Ed Sullivan wrote:


Actually I found the Q1 to be a pretty lively performer on such
limited power. A friend of mine put a Kawasaki in his, but I liked it
better with the Onan.

The only problem was that Onans loved to die.


Well, at least they probably died happy. :-)

Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and "Quickie"
  #4  
Old May 26th 05, 07:33 AM
guynoir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would say probably all of them. In my opinion, the best performance
enhancement for a Q-1 would be an 8 stone pilot, (read my disclaimer).
I'm closer to 16 stone myself.

I have all five issues of the "Flying and Glider Manual" from the EAA.
They are extremely interesting reading, and they really drive home the
fact that minimalist, high performance airplanes with dodgy engines like
the Q-1 have been around a long time.

Stealth Pilot wrote:
is there a better engine for the Q1 than the onans?
Stealth Pilot





--
John Kimmel


Naturally, these humorous remarks are all entirely my own opinion, based
solely
on rumor, supposition, innuendo and damned lies, and should be
interpreted in a
spirit of fun. My memory is faulty, also.

  #5  
Old May 26th 05, 06:53 PM
Rich Ahrens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and "Quickie"


C'mon, Ron - spill it...
  #6  
Old May 26th 05, 09:12 PM
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rich Ahrens wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote:

Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and
"Quickie"



C'mon, Ron - spill it...


It's Biblical.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #7  
Old May 26th 05, 11:27 PM
Rich Ahrens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired wrote:

Rich Ahrens wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and
"Quickie"




C'mon, Ron - spill it...


Yes, I know. I was playing on the phraseaology. Spilled it on the
ground, remember?
  #8  
Old May 27th 05, 01:58 AM
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rich Ahrens wrote:
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired wrote:

Rich Ahrens wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and
"Quickie"




C'mon, Ron - spill it...



Yes, I know. I was playing on the phraseaology. Spilled it on the
ground, remember?


I did get it. I had something else in mind when I wrote that. Something
about getting a grip.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #9  
Old May 27th 05, 02:45 AM
Mark Hickey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired" wrote:

Rich Ahrens wrote:
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired wrote:

Rich Ahrens wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:

Ron Wanttaja, who's always amused by the juxtaposition of "Onan" and
"Quickie"

C'mon, Ron - spill it...


Yes, I know. I was playing on the phraseaology. Spilled it on the
ground, remember?


I did get it. I had something else in mind when I wrote that. Something
about getting a grip.


In NJ, there was a business named Onan Plumbing... didn't seem like
great marketing to any Old Testament scholars.

Mark "maybe they specialized in cleaning pipes?" Hickey
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.