|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
May 27th 05, 04:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
John T wrote:
Listen. They *knew* they'd be dealing with the ADIZ. There's a fair amount of evidence that they didn't know but won't admit it. There was a post in the last two days to the effect that the FAA found a pre-9-11 chart in the aircraft and that the pilots intended to fly the old VFR exclusion through the class-B. I'm looking forward to AOPA's analysis of the hearings, once those are done. The FAA isn't going to tell what it knows until the hearings, and the PIC isn't ever going to tell what he knows. George Patterson "Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't got no clothes on - and are up to somethin'. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ANOTHER airspace incursion in D.C.? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 53 | November 17th 03 04:19 PM |
| Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 03:33 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| New Air Force guidance issued for frocking | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 01:10 AM |
| FAA Waiver / Security Statement | Ron Natalie | Piloting | 0 | July 24th 03 01:22 AM |
Threaded Mode