![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tedstriker" wrote The only shock absorber I have is the foam in the seat cushion. So I am thinking that the belly pod should be reinforced to possibly provide some shock absorbing ability. Couldn't hurt. Remember that parts tearing off, also removes energy. I'm not so sure that I wouldn't design it to break away, after some reasonable stress. Is it possible to put some closed cell Styrofoam (like cheap ice chests) between your seat foam and the floor? That is what is in motorcycle helmets. I agree with your assessment that the pod up or down isn't a significant issue. Personally, I would go with what looks best. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:55:44 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote: "Tedstriker" wrote The only shock absorber I have is the foam in the seat cushion. So I am thinking that the belly pod should be reinforced to possibly provide some shock absorbing ability. Couldn't hurt. Remember that parts tearing off, also removes energy. I'm not so sure that I wouldn't design it to break away, after some reasonable stress. Is it possible to put some closed cell Styrofoam (like cheap ice chests) between your seat foam and the floor? That is what is in motorcycle helmets. I agree with your assessment that the pod up or down isn't a significant issue. Personally, I would go with what looks best. Yes, and the pod that is designed for the eze's is better inverted on my plane's belly, as that way the pod's tail has an upsweep, and better ground clearance in the 3-point attitude. I may in fact have room to put some closed cell foam under the pilots seat. And if so, I'll put some in there. I forgot to mention, the pilot's seat is a canvas sling-type attached to a 4130 steel frame. So that would probably stretch and provide some additional cushioning, if it didn't tear. If that happened, that would be the time to have the foam underneath. The break away idea sounds reasonable, so I won't get carried away making it too strong. If it were, I would assume it would transfer stress to other areas of the airframe, causing other failures. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Would the AH-6J (Little Bird make a good, low cost, helicopter for force protection? | John Hairell | Military Aviation | 1 | May 17th 04 04:21 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |