A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hold "as published"?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 03, 03:29 AM
K. Ari Krupnikov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" writes:

Whichever one your little heart desires.


And here I was, thinking I had people convinced I had a large heart. I
hate it when people call my bluff.

If you've still got a radar target you can still separate from a NORDO
aircraft. If you've got no radar then everything beneath the NORDO is
effectively shut down until it's known to be on the ground.


If you are NORDO, your mode C might not work either... How would ATC
know who's below it?

Ari.
  #2  
Old September 19th 03, 03:33 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"K. Ari Krupnikov" wrote in message
...

If you are NORDO, your mode C might not work either... How would ATC
know who's below it?


Whoa there, big hearted fellow. If you're now gonna say the comm failure
might spread to your transponder and encoder leaving you nonradar as well as
NORDO, then I'm gonna say it can spread to your nav radios as well, leaving
you unable to hold anywhere. All the more reason to put it on the ground as
soon as possible.


  #3  
Old September 19th 03, 05:50 AM
Ray Andraka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

All the more reason to have a handheld comm, a handheld GPS (turned on using
ship's power for the whole flight so you don't have to wait for it to find
itself), and plenty of fresh batteries.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"K. Ari Krupnikov" wrote in message
...

If you are NORDO, your mode C might not work either... How would ATC
know who's below it?


Whoa there, big hearted fellow. If you're now gonna say the comm failure
might spread to your transponder and encoder leaving you nonradar as well as
NORDO, then I'm gonna say it can spread to your nav radios as well, leaving
you unable to hold anywhere. All the more reason to put it on the ground as
soon as possible.


--
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950
email
http://www.andraka.com

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759


  #4  
Old November 13th 03, 02:32 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ray Andraka" wrote in message
...

All the more reason to have a handheld comm, a handheld GPS (turned on

using
ship's power for the whole flight so you don't have to wait for it to find
itself), and plenty of fresh batteries.


If you have a handheld comm you're not NORDO.


  #5  
Old November 13th 03, 03:19 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net

If you have a handheld comm you're not NORDO.


You may as well be if the handheld doesn't have the power to reach ATC.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer
__________



  #7  
Old September 19th 03, 01:27 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Megginson" wrote in message
...

You are supposed to be flying at your planned altitude. I don't know
how far ATC would be willing to trust that, though -- you'd certainly
be within your rights to choose a different altitude to avoid
turbulence or icing.


Where are those rights found?



How good a job can primary surveillance radar do on picking out a
target's altitude?


It can't do that job at all.


  #8  
Old September 19th 03, 01:33 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" writes:

You are supposed to be flying at your planned altitude. I don't know
how far ATC would be willing to trust that, though -- you'd certainly
be within your rights to choose a different altitude to avoid
turbulence or icing.


Where are those rights found?


Emergency authority of the pilot (sorry, I left out the adjective
"severe" before "turbulence"). If I'm flying in IMC and go NORDO,
then hit icing or severe turbulence, I'm not going to worry about
sticking with my flight-plan altitude.

I don't claim that it would be OK for the pilot to change altitude
just to avoid light or moderate chop.


All the best,


David
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Screw hold repair in fabric? Brian Huffaker Home Built 11 May 29th 04 02:07 AM
Need Hold Harmless Waver for Ultralight or Experimental Sale Larry Smith Home Built 9 August 19th 03 02:47 AM
Need a Waiver/ Hold Harmless Agreement for UL / Experimental Sale Richard_Tonry Home Built 2 August 17th 03 12:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.