![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tim J wrote: The bottom line is the approach is the approach - I don't think it is intended as a "suggestion." - why stay above the heights? Wouldn't you rather get down as fast as possible than be in the clouds? The altitudes on the approach chart guarantee more than reasonable obstacle clearance - not performing the approach as published would also lead me to wonder if there are other things you would make up your own procedures for and as a DE I would consider that a bad thing... Another "bottom line" is that the stepdown altitude in a NPA profile is a *minimum* altitude. If you think in terms of getting down to a stepdown to "get out of the clouds" that is a good way to find granite or trees instead of water vapor. This is not just my view; the industry/government accident stats are replete. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Price of Flying Wires? | PWK | Home Built | 34 | October 8th 17 09:24 PM |
| Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 08:28 PM |
| high impedance, low impedance? | JFLEISC | Home Built | 5 | April 11th 04 07:53 AM |
| MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 04:35 AM |
| High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 09:35 PM |