![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
The question remains, if neither pilot aboard the landing 737 could see the
Fairchild 227 on the runway, why should we believe the crew of the Fairchild 227 could have seen the incoming 737 if they had been cocked some thirty degrees or so from the runway centerline? The accident happened shortly before sunset on runway 24. So the pilots on the 737 would have been looking nearly into the sun whereas a pilot looking back would be seeing a landing light in a darkening sky. But regardless of the details of this particular incident, why not have the redundancy of having both aircraft crews in a position where they could observe and possibly avert an imminent collision? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 12:35 PM |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| Position and Hold at uncontrolled field | dave | Piloting | 42 | February 26th 04 02:25 AM |
| Hold "as published"? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | November 13th 03 04:19 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |