![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kecin, thanks for the info. I'll have to check out the Lancair and the Aerocomop though I am not familiar with the latter. You are right, the purpose of IFR is just in case. I would keep my skills up. Unfortunately, I don't think anything short of a big piece of jewelery on the other end of the trip would get my wife into the plane. Even then, once she got it she would rather walk back. Thanks Barry "Kevin O'Brien" kevin@org-header-is-my-domain-name wrote in message news:2005081902353243658%kevin@orgheaderismydomain name... On 2005-08-08 16:57:27 -0400, "Barry" said: Barry, that is a good, logical list of requirements. Only you know, though, how you prioritize them. For instance, some of the other responces seemed to assume you would be flying hard IMC a lot. That's not what I'm getting -- I'm getting you want to be legal to fly in the system and current to shoot an approach if you need to to visit the grandkids. Bear in mind that instrument flying is a highly perishable skill. You gotta be sharpening it all the time or it gets dull on you. This is routine. Lancair Kit has had a lot of builders through their (very excellent) Builder Assistance program, where they build major parts of the plane on site with factory jigs and professional help as required. And all but one of them (including Legacy FG builders, "the bottom of the line") put in IFR panels. The January 2005 Kitplanes has a breakdown on autopilots for experimentals. One specific plane I have been looking at is Van's RV-10. Any comments on this? Really have not come across any other options. The Lancair ES meets all your requirements. The comments others have made about a high landing speed are also true. You can keep it down a bit by building it as light as you can. The canards are the same way, high landing speeds. Aerocomp builds a number of kits that are ugly but strong and surprisingly fast. One advantage of the RV-10 that can be adduced from other Van's products is, that it is likely to have good resale value. Kit aircraft generally have poor resale value and sell for little more than the value of the motor and other certified/TSOd parts. However, there are few RV-10s out there. Bear in mind that even good designers occasionally lay an egg (as Chris Heintz did with the CH810). Several others have suggested that if you want to fly, not to build per se, you may be better off buying a plane. A Cirrus SR22 meets most of your requirements, and with the auto-like interior and the emergency parachute, you might even get your wife into it. cheers -=K=- Rule #1: Don't hit anything big. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |