![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
My mistake. The "XP-47" I found in the previous post is really an 1943
XP-47J speed-record prototype and it probably has a fat prop. I can't find an online pic of the original prop -- I have plenty of books around here that show it. The paddle blade prop increased high-altitude climb performance by about 400 feet per minute. "Seth Masia" wrote in message ... Specifically, here's the first XP-47 prototype with its conventional four-blade prop: http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org...es/xp47j-1.jpg And here's the late-war P-47D with the paddle blade prop. Note the cuffs around the prop roots. http://home.att.net/~historyzone/p-47d-27-re.JPG "George Patterson" wrote in message news:qWaOe.2407$SW1.1776@trndny09... Frankie wrote: ...not familiar with this example. Perhaps you could fill us in. Early P-47s had a fairly typical military prop when they first came out. The planes were heavy for a single (over 7 tons). They had pretty good high altitude performance, unbeatable dive characteristics, could take immense amounts of punishment, but they didn't maneuver well (compared to planes like the Spitfire) and they guzzled gas. Later in the war, the Thunderbolt was re-equipped with a prop which had comparatively wide blades -- the pilots called it a "paddle-blade" prop. Rate-of-climb and maneuverability immediately improved to the point that a good Jug pilot could out-maneuver a Spitfire. Fuel consumption also improved a bit. The prop simply made better use of the engine's power. Not sure this is applicable to the Mooney. I suspect that the short legs on the Mooney make a short prop necessary, so a paddle blade gets the best results. Don't forget that a prop is essentially a rotating wing. Increase the width of a wing and you will increase lift (at the expense of increased drag). When the wing is your prop, that increased "lift" translates to increased thrust. With the P-47, the plane had the power to make the increased drag unimportant. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 11:18 PM |
| Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 04:04 AM |
| IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 7th 03 12:43 AM |
| Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 08:45 PM |
| New Prop on my Mooney Ovation | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 1 | July 7th 03 11:30 PM |