A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mooney 201 prop



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old August 22nd 05, 09:12 AM
Seth Masia
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My mistake. The "XP-47" I found in the previous post is really an 1943
XP-47J speed-record prototype and it probably has a fat prop. I can't find
an online pic of the original prop -- I have plenty of books around here
that show it. The paddle blade prop increased high-altitude climb
performance by about 400 feet per minute.

"Seth Masia" wrote in message
...
Specifically, here's the first XP-47 prototype with its conventional
four-blade prop:
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org...es/xp47j-1.jpg

And here's the late-war P-47D with the paddle blade prop. Note the cuffs
around the prop roots. http://home.att.net/~historyzone/p-47d-27-re.JPG

"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:qWaOe.2407$SW1.1776@trndny09...
Frankie wrote:

...not familiar with this example. Perhaps you could fill us in.


Early P-47s had a fairly typical military prop when they first came out.
The planes were heavy for a single (over 7 tons). They had pretty good
high altitude performance, unbeatable dive characteristics, could take
immense amounts of punishment, but they didn't maneuver well (compared to
planes like the Spitfire) and they guzzled gas. Later in the war, the
Thunderbolt was re-equipped with a prop which had comparatively wide
blades -- the pilots called it a "paddle-blade" prop. Rate-of-climb and
maneuverability immediately improved to the point that a good Jug pilot
could out-maneuver a Spitfire. Fuel consumption also improved a bit. The
prop simply made better use of the engine's power.

Not sure this is applicable to the Mooney. I suspect that the short legs
on the Mooney make a short prop necessary, so a paddle blade gets the
best results.

Don't forget that a prop is essentially a rotating wing. Increase the
width of a wing and you will increase lift (at the expense of increased
drag). When the wing is your prop, that increased "lift" translates to
increased thrust. With the P-47, the plane had the power to make the
increased drag unimportant.

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? Gus Rasch Aerobatics 1 February 14th 08 11:18 PM
Ivo Prop on O-320 Dave S Home Built 14 October 15th 04 04:04 AM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 7th 03 12:43 AM
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop Larry Smith Home Built 21 September 26th 03 08:45 PM
New Prop on my Mooney Ovation Charles Talleyrand Owning 1 July 7th 03 11:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.