![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
hannu wrote:
"David Kinsell" wrote in message ... Or, could be 1995. Or 2015. With all the stink about Y2K, it's a little surprising they came up with a scheme that has a 10 year rollover problem. NOW it would be very easy decode the year by base 36 number to push the problem until 2035... ![]() That's the weird thing. They used digits and characters for the date, they used digits and characters for the month, and just used digits for the year. Only they decided on format in the last millenium. Yep. I guess some people just can't think ahead :-) hannu |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 10:45 PM |