![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Peter Skelton wrote: [SNIP] Surface to air technology has improved to the point where a Harpoon launcher can be at excessive risk. ISTM that the USAF wants to stand back a bit farther. Peter Skelton Which brings me back to the question in the original post. Why is the USAF taking the lead in this, and not the Navy? With 10 carriers deployed at any given time, the Navy can't adequately cover the 7 seas unless you're willing to wait days, sometimes weeks for force projection. Remember, anything beyond 500 miles from the boat is becoming a reach for the Navy unless we're talking P-3's, and I don't want to send a P-3 into any sort of hostile environment. With the Air Force, they can put a Buff over any likely trouble spot in 18 hours. KB |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 1 | June 4th 05 07:52 PM |
| Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 04:36 AM |
| THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 10:01 PM |
| THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 01:52 AM |
| P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 10:02 PM |