![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:16:50 -0600, bowman wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote: The engines used in production LSAs must meet the consensus standard for engines, ASTM F 2339-04. It is greatly simplified over 14CFR Part 33, but there are definite design criteria the engine must meet, documentation that must be generated, and endurance testing that must be performed. Is that standard realistic? I don't mean that as the start of another long war, just as a general question. At one point we subcontracted to produce airport lighting systems (the rabbit) and that standard encapsulated 1940's technology. For instance, the wiring harnesses had to be laced since there was a suspicion of the new fangled nylon ties, and the sequencing was done with an electro-mechanical stepper relay. The ASTM engine standard is all of two and a half pages long...about 1/10th the size of Part 33 (although Part 33 covers stuff like jet engines, too). As far as I can tell, it does not require specific implementations, such as the lacing you mention). Here's an example, from Paragraph 5.6, "Electronic Engine Controllers (EEC)": "...for protection against radiated EMI/HIRF, the harnesses or cables should be shielded from each sensor to each end point and electrically bonded to the engine. Filter pin connectors should be located at the controller housing interface and shunted to ground on the case. Filter pin connectors should have 40 dB attenuation, minimum." Nothing on *how* the cables should be shielded, just a requirement to shield them. Ron Wanttaja |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Nothing on how the cables should be shielded, just a requirement to shield them. That is better than some of the documents I've worked with. I wonder how many existing engines would meet the standard as is or with minor modification -- if the manufacturer were interested in a share in a very small market. Back to the numbers game... ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 01:56 AM |
| Enjoy High Quality incredible low cost PC-to-phone and broadband phone services | John | Home Built | 0 | May 19th 05 03:58 PM |
| Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 03:39 AM |
| Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 08:28 PM |
| Could it happen he The High Cost of Operating in Europe | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 5 | July 14th 03 03:34 AM |