![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eanest:
How about a related question? On my Helio Courier the fusilage/wing intersection is slightly less than 90deg. The intersection looks like an aerodynamic disaster. How much drag would be eliminated with a fairing than can only come down the fusilage three inches? How about a two part fairing (one part would be on the door) that could come down 6 inches? Mike "Ernest Christley" wrote in message om... Kyle Boatright wrote: Help me figure out how much speed my RV can gain by fairing the Pitot Tube. The pitot is made of 3/8" OD aluminium tube, with a 6" length perpendicular to the airstream. That gives a surface area of 3/8" x 6" = 2 1/4 sq inches. My understanding is that the Cd of a cylinder is .5 and the Cd of a faired shape can be as low as 0.005, but let's assume 0.05 for the faired shape. The effective area is .5 x 2 1/4 square inches = 1.125 square inches for the cylinder. and 0.05 x 2 1/4 = 0.1125 square inches for the streamlined shape. The difference is 1.125-.1125 = 1.06875 square inches. Let's call it 1 square inch... Assuming I'm in the ballpark so far, how much power can I "save" at 175 mph by streamlining the pitot, which eliminates essentially 1 square inch from the aircraft's effective frontal area? KB Kyle, any answer you get will be further complicated by the modifications in intersection drag. But ignoring that... From http://142.26.194.131/aerodynamics1/Drag/Page4.html , the equation for parasitic drag is: Dp = CDp x S x ½ r V^2 Essentially, once you remove the drag of the unfair pitot tube, and then accellerate, Dp will come out the same. You're using the all the horses the engine has to make the plane go faster, vs dragging a pitot tube around. So: CDp x S1 x ½ r V1^2 = Dp = CDp x S2 x ½ r V2^2 I only marked S and V with ones and two's, because everything else will drop out of the equation (making a BIG and unlikely assumption that the drag coefficient doesn't change), leaving: S1xV1^2 = S2xV2^2 But the useful form of this for your purposes is: V2^2 = S1 x V1^2 / S2 Now, your fairing the pitot is only one part of the entire airplane, and the entire airplance has to be considered to determine the increase in speed. I have no clue what the surface area of an RV of any sort is (but a Delta is 183ft^2 8*) Assuming your RV has the surface area of a C-172, 174ft^2, you've just dropped 0.007ft^2. Plugging the numbers: V2^2 = 174 x 175^2 / 173.993 V2^2 = 30,626 V2 = 175.00352 Are we ready for Reno yet 8*) You'd probably double this increase by cleaning up the intersection drag. If the tube is located in a position that will cause it to produce rough air for everything behind it, there would also be some (insignificant) benefit to be gained there. -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| max altitude and Mach 1 | Boomer | Military Aviation | 22 | June 1st 04 09:04 PM |
| Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 07:42 PM |
| Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 01:18 AM |
| Forward CG Experience | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 41 | November 19th 03 03:54 PM |
| Did we decide if ballasted pullups are higher???????? | Lars Peder Hansen | Soaring | 22 | October 8th 03 01:45 AM |