![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... Kilo Charlie wrote: OK I'll "bite back" BB. I would prefer the statement to be "you cannot legislate good judgement". There is a huge difference between rules and laws that protect life by protecting the human body e.g. seat belts and parachutes and those that make an attempt to force people into making the "correct" choice. OK, I'll bite: what is this huge difference, and how does it apply to contest rules? We also make traffic rules about stopping at traffic lights and driving on the right side of the rule, which seem to be safety related. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA Interesting response Eric. My statement had no underlying meaning as you appear to imply. I am pretty certain having spent a fair amount of time talking to John at a contest in Uvalde several years ago that he and I would agree on more than we disagree. One thing for sure is that I agree with his point that I don't wish this to degenerate into another arguement over finish lines. Re the specific complaint....BB used some examples that included things that help protect our pink little bodies from the elements of destruction....my point was that they are very different from pure rules whose only purpose are to prevent you from doing something stupid and provide no benefit in and of themselves beyond that. I'd be the first to say that there are PLENTY of traffic laws (since that seems to be the theme here) that attempt to force people into making the correct judgements......speed limits, DUI laws, etc. If everyone would always have good judgement we wouldn't need them......that's your point right? Where we disagree is that the traffic rules are a poor analogy. Basically everyone drives. It is required to be employed or to get to school, buy food, etc. Nobody is forcing not even a single pilot into racing. It is not necessary to get a job or to obtain food and I'm still looking for the girls that think its cool. All that I am asking and I think that John is asking is that we present both sides and be reasonable about evaluating each proposal. This format is a poor one for having these discussions. I would like to think given the chance to sit down together that we would find common ground much faster than appears from following these threads. Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dear Fellow Sailplane Racers | g l i d e r s t u d | Soaring | 0 | October 1st 05 08:48 AM |
| Duster Plans For Sale - BJ-1b fullsize sailplane plans | WoodHawk | Soaring | 0 | April 25th 05 05:37 AM |
| LAST CALL - Free Beer for Sailplane Racers!! | Region 6 Contest Manager | Soaring | 3 | June 7th 04 03:14 AM |
| Free Beer for Sailplane Racers - The Tradition Continues! | Region 6 Contest Manager | Soaring | 1 | May 28th 04 03:02 PM |
| Ultralight sailplane aerotow liability | Caracole | Soaring | 18 | April 1st 04 10:17 PM |