|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
October 6th 05, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
Hypothetically of course: Let's take a 172N, make it composite, same 160hp, no struts, flush antennae, with all the speed mods and a few other tweaks. What kind of performance increase would we see? Along similar lines would these changes turn the 172RG into a real performer? (FYI: I love flying the Cutlass). Also, if they used the same design, but used composite, would Cessna need to run through the entire certification process again? Just curious and I'm not suggesting Cessna will revamp the 172 (maybe, maybe not). Hilton 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 04:40 PM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 03:37 AM |
| Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 07:51 PM |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 01:57 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
Threaded Mode