A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flying Thru Congested Areas



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old January 7th 04, 03:30 PM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"O. Sami Saydjari" The shortest route would take
me straight over the top of
Detroit and Clevland and Pittsburg (I am flying from Central Wisconsin
to Washington D.C. to be specific).

I'm not familiar with this route but did you do a great circle route *and*
plot the actual great circle route on the chart to determine the
'conflicts'? I assume you are using a GPS to fly and it will follow the
great circle route using direct routing but it is not always obvious what
that line looks like on the chart unless you plot a few points. A fuel or
rest stop can change the entire equation once fuel prices are factored in.
Perhaps this is a no brainer, but
that does not sound like a particularly good route to me, just because
of the congrestion in these spaces. The congestion (a) increases the
likelihood of vectoring delays, and (b) decreases my safety somewhat
because the probability of a collision is somewhat higher (although,
still quite small, I realize).

The big question here is IFR or VFR. IFR you take your chances with regard
to routing. You can influence it but not control it. OTOH, you get more
help in reducing the probablility of a collision. Depending on weather, IFR
may be the only way or the optimal way depending on the weather. Or VFR may
be the way to stay out of the weather. If weather offers a choice, I find
IFR often easier on such flights because of the help in airspace management
(TFRs, Restricted, etc) and I prefer to fly at IFR altitudes with maximum
ATC involvement.
If I pick a route to the south, I could avoid all of these areas by
about 30 miles, but it adds about 60-70 miles to my trip. Even at 30
miles south, I imagine the congestion will be significant. In fact, a
controller once implied that it is often better to go straight across
the top of a major airport because there are fewer airplanes in
transition there (descending for approach, or climbing for departure).

So, what do you folks suggest? Thanks in advance for you advice.


If you are IFR capable, planning a VFR flight, but without a lot of
experience flying such flights, fly IFR and use it as a learn-the-system
experience. That's the only way to really figure out the best way to do
such a flight in the future


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marske Flying Wing discussion Group mat Redsell Home Built 0 September 19th 04 02:58 PM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 06:07 PM
Flying Wing Design workshop in july 04 mat Redsell Home Built 1 May 5th 04 02:53 PM
Flying Magazine's Instrument Flying 1973 Steven P. McNicoll Instrument Flight Rules 16 January 12th 04 04:50 PM
seeking info from NW Ontario/ Upper Midwest Pilots flying intoAtikokan David Megginson Instrument Flight Rules 0 July 9th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.