![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:UDA9f.10245$bD.4407@trndny01... It is *not* ok to use a non-certified part. My take on the matter is that, if an aircraft was certified to use Delco part number AC-9732-5, I can install a Delco AC-9732-5 that I bought at the local NAPA dealer. I have heard that certain assholes in the FAA feel that a Delco AC-9732-5 purchased from NAPA isn't ok; that you have to buy it from, say, Piper for it to be legal. My take on that is that they are wrong, and, given that nobody can tell where I bought my Delco AC-9732-5 unless I tell them, I *will* "get away with it." IMHO, a caveat here is that sometimes parts are manufactured in bulk, and then certified through additional testing by another party (such as the aircraft manufacturer). Just because the part is manufactured by the same manufacturer who made it for the aircraft doesn't mean it's certified for that use. However, as far as I know, when the part is certified through the third party, it's labeled as such. You wouldn't find an aircraft type certificate specifying "Delco AC-9732-5" if that part was certified through the aircraft manufacturer; it would be relabled something else. The problem comes in when one looks at the part being replaced, rather than the type certificate, maintenance manual, etc. The part itself may not have any of its markings changed after going through another layer of inspection. For that matter, the installed part might not be legal. It might seem silly to worry about a light bulb, but it may be that the "certified" version of the bulb has been tested to ensure a variety of things that are important for aircraft, but not as important for other uses. Fire hazard comes to mind, for example. I mean, you don't really want your bulb catching things on fire regardless of where you're using it, but being on fire while in the air in an aircraft is especially bad news. Not that I know bulbs are actually tested for fire hazard...it's just something I expect they could be tested for. My point is simply that if one doesn't know for a fact that a part from one source is identical IN EVERY WAY to the same part from another source, one should make sure they've obtained the part through an aviation-approved source. Pete |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Skycraft Landing Light Pix, Part II | Jay Honeck | Owning | 6 | February 6th 05 09:38 PM |
| Skycraft Landing Light Installation Pix | Jay Honeck | Owning | 5 | February 6th 05 03:05 PM |
| Skycraft Landing Light? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 8 | May 28th 04 08:23 PM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 07:11 AM |