|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
January 24th 04, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Does it? Yes, it mentions "via RUT VOR/DME" in the missed text, but there aren't actually any fixes that use DME from RUT. The only DME callout I see in the missed is GITEW, which is I-RUT 16.4. I can't see any reason this approach wouldn't be flyable with the RUT DME out of service, as long as the VOR azimuth was still operating. I didn't say the procedure used DME information from RUT VOR/DME. The navaid is called a VOR/DME. The missed approach procedure includes a climb to 2600 via direct to the VOR/DME and then the 221 radial from it. You can't do that if the navaid is out of service. As long as the VOR portion is working, you can. The status of the DME portion is immaterial to this approach. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode