![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:01:05 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: If the TRACON is issuing radar vectors off the ground, then, as I quoted from the AIM, that would supersede any ODP. But ATC is then responsible for obstacle clearance, of course. How can they issue radar vectors before you're in radar contact? This has come up before. If SMO is Class E surface area when the tower is closed (and it probably is), then the heading to fly after takeoff can be specified by ATC. Maybe there is a DVA. "After takeoff", of course, refers to leaving 400' AGL on runway heading. In previous discussions, there has been some confusion as to how the pilot knows that the vector should be considered a "radar vector" and I don't think there's been a real clear-cut answer. Certainly happens at big city airports; and it wouldn't surprise me if that was in effect at SMO in the shadow of LAX. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should you tell Tower you're departing IFR | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 75 | October 4th 05 05:56 PM |
| Los Angeles radio tower crash kills 2 | Paul Hirose | Piloting | 178 | August 6th 05 04:46 PM |
| New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 06:35 PM |
| Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Home Built | 4 | July 26th 03 12:34 PM |
| Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 2 | July 24th 03 10:11 PM |