![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The standard lapse rate is 3.5F per 1000'. So it you are going to fly
at 5000' above the ground, the temp up there will be 17.5 degrees colder. Giving 5 degrees for variation, that is 22 degrees colder. So in this case it would have to be 44 degrees or higher on the ground to not have ice 5000' higher. (I've done some rounding). Of course you COULD have inversion. But inversion means it is warmer above. You could also have a non-standard lapse rate. But this is a calculation worth doing. Usually people have a place on the airplane where ice forms first. It will usually be something thin, like an antennae or strut. You can use that as a guage. Thin frontal surfaces ice up first and worse. Some sort of physics thing about the air in front deflecting the moisture. More deflection with fatter curves. But usually my first indication of ice has been decreased aircraft performance (if I am in level flight). Descending or climbing is a little harder to tell. As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. The word is that horizontal stablizer icing is the worst thing on decent. Don't use flaps for landing if you have ice when you land and land a little faster. Do everything at higher airspeed if you have ice. This will keep you above stall speed (hopefully). See that is the problem. Due to different shape of the wing due to ice the plane will stall at a higher airspeed. Another item. We all know to stay out of thunderstorms, but you should stay out of towering cumulus too, even if they aren't thundering and lighting. It is icy in there. I think the abreviation for these is CB. Don't fly in CB's. A lot of times there is just a thin layer of clouds, like 1000' thick that you have to climb and decend through. And there is ice in them. That one is a close call. If you have a PIREP or other good info and know it is clear on top, it is tempting to try and climb on up. The lower the ceiling is below, the riskier this is. You will have to evaluate and make your own judgement. Talking to a pilot who has just landed is very valuable. Hang out at the fuel desk. Maybe someone will come in who just flew through it. Sometimes airmets are wrong. Ice tends to be worse at the initial part of the front, and an old icing airmet MAY be invalid, just hasn't been cancelled yet. All depends. But if someone comes down through it and he says he didn't pick up any ice and he doesnt think anyone would, that can be helpful information. Like someone else mentioned. you can venture fairly safely into icy clouds if you have warm VFR conditions under you, above the MEA, no mountains and flat terrain. If you ice up, just descend. If you tell ATC you have ice, be prepared to answer their questions about it. Rime or clean? What is the temperature etc. They usually want a full report. After all, if you have ice, YOU'RE the expert. Having a turbocharged and high power to weight ratio is a godsend in ice. Just climb up through it to clear above. Thats what the airlines do. Sometimes they dont even turn on their deice cause it takes away power. They'd just rather climb like a homesick angel and get out of it. All depends. But the point is, being able to CLIMB is a godsend. They need their deice mostly on decent. If you cant outclimb it, and you have low ceilings below you, my suggestion would be TURN AROUND, unless you know that you have VMC in front of you SOON. Presumbably, you didn't get ice back there and if you go back there you wont accumulate it. Whatever you do , don't just try and hold altitude while you go slower and slower. That's how you stall and spin. Even a decent below the MEA is safer than that strategy. And ATC will be telling you he cant give you any lower. Just declare an emergency if you have to. MEA's have at least 1000' cushion, usually more. It would be a desperate crap shoot to be accumulating ice, unable to hold altitude, and have to decend below the MEA. Good way to run into something. This is the reason why I don't do this kind of stuff. Like I said, we all get ice now and then if we fly in the clouds below freezing. But don't get yourself boxed in. If you don't have an out, fly to where you do have an out. And don't fly into a trap where you can't outclimb the ice, and you can't decend because of low ceilings. That is where the icing accidents occur. That and on landing with a load of ice. I hope that helps. Bottom line, you can't really do much about ice except stay out of it, or get out of it if you are in it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Nov 2005 11:39:06 -0800, Doug wrote:
Hey Doug The standard lapse rate is 3.5F per 1000'. So it you are going to fly at 5000' above the ground, the temp up there will be 17.5 degrees colder. Giving 5 degrees for variation, that is 22 degrees colder. So in this case it would have to be 44 degrees or higher on the ground to not have ice 5000' higher. (I've done some rounding). Of course you COULD have inversion. But inversion means it is warmer above. You could also have a non-standard lapse rate. But this is a calculation worth doing. My thoughts b4 launching was that most of the flight was going to be between 3500 and 4500 AGL on the first portion of the flight. Since sleet was falling, I honestly expected the temperature to remain or rise a little. More deflection with fatter curves. But usually my first indication of ice has been decreased aircraft performance (if I am in level flight). Descending or climbing is a little harder to tell. Yep, exactly right, I had to add power, and I knew that was not normal, thus no longer depending on the wings for icing but looking at the temperature probe. No wing strut for my Sundowner *smile*. As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. Which was my initial thought, to maintain as "normal" as possible. I don't want to stick around in the clouds any longer then necessary, but I don't want do something reckless either by descending too quickly.. I wasn't even going to think about deploying flaps. Figured the less metal hanging out, the less that ice could collect. A lot of times there is just a thin layer of clouds, like 1000' thick that you have to climb and decend through. And there is ice in them. That one is a close call. For me, won't take a chance if there is known icing. Not worth it. Just like anything else we do, there is a risk of the unknown, but for me, if there is ice reported I simply won't go. If you tell ATC you have ice, be prepared to answer their questions about it. Rime or clean? What is the temperature etc. They usually want a full report. After all, if you have ice, YOU'RE the expert. Which I did when asked by Center. I was surprised that they gave me a block altitude. Maybe I was a little more pro-active and insuring I get out of the situation. Just glad it did not become an event. it. All depends. But the point is, being able to CLIMB is a godsend. They need their deice mostly on decent. If you cant outclimb it, and you have low ceilings below you, my suggestion would be TURN AROUND, Good advice, and in my case, I was right at the tops, so climbing was my only option. unless you know that you have VMC in front of you SOON. And this was my quandry. I was on top, BWG was VMC but from my view, it was solid overcast, yet ASOS reported broken 4300. So, I knew that the clouds were about 1700 feet thick based on my current conditions I was experiencing. Like I said, we all get ice now and then if we fly in the clouds below freezing. I truly hope I never get myself in this situation. Thankfully, I am down south where icing is an unusual event. I have been flying in the winter for two seasons, and only once did I come close to freezing temperatures in the clouds. It was a local flight, doing IFR training, and I had plenty of outs since it was local. But don't get yourself boxed in. If you don't have an out, fly to where you do have an out. And don't fly into a trap where you can't outclimb the ice, and you can't decend because of low ceilings. That is where the icing accidents occur. That and on landing with a load of ice. Bottom line, good advice above and well appreciated. Allen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: For me, won't take a chance if there is known icing. Not worth it. Just
: like anything else we do, there is a risk of the unknown, but for me, if : there is ice reported I simply won't go. As someone else mentioned, icing airmets are present for large sections of the country for large portions of the year. Given the litigious society we're in and the unknown of icing, SCARE-MET zulu is issued if the conditions are possibly favorable for icing. It is sometimes possible to fly safely in such conditions if one knows what they're doing. It's also quite possible to be really stupid and/or ignorant about it and get into big trouble. Certainly nobody should fault you for a conservative attitude like that. If they are, they're an arrogant ass. Icing is nothing to mess around with for real. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Nov 2005 11:39:06 -0800, "Doug"
wrote: As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. The word is that horizontal stablizer icing is the worst thing on decent. Don't use flaps for landing if you have ice when you land and land a little faster. Do everything at higher airspeed if you have ice. This will keep you above stall speed (hopefully). See that is the problem. Due to different shape of the wing due to ice the plane will stall at a higher airspeed. It is my understanding that ice forms less quickly when a propellor turns faster. If you want to descend quickly (low RPM) would the prop icing up and be a problem? As fo noticing ice, in the PA28 I fly, the first hint was on the left corner of the windshield (can't remember if it was top or bottom). There was also slight frosting on the temp probe. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:11:04 -0500, Dave Butler wrote:
wrote: It is my understanding that ice forms less quickly when a propellor turns faster. If you want to descend quickly (low RPM) would the prop icing up and be a problem? Don't know the answer to the icing question, but if I want to descend faster (vertical speed) I go to *high* RPM. More drag and you can point the nose down more steeply without picking up as much speed. Thanks. I guess you have variable prop - I don't (PA28) :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |