![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 at 08:56:56 in message
, Ron Garret wrote: That's actually what keeps the plane in the air. See http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/airfoils...ation-vortices rg That is a good article. I would partially disagree in that he minimises viscosity of the air as a factor. True it is small, however if the air had no viscosity then there would be no circulation and hence no lift. He actually shows diagrams without circulation which produce no lift. The necessity of viscosity was demonstrated by Jean le Rond d'Alembert. In fact he did painstaking mathematics, without recognising viscosity, and failed to be able to show why there should be any forces on a body in an airflow at all. He went to his grave a puzzled and dissatisfied man. That is d'Alembert's Paradox. -- David CL Francis |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbulence | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 19 | October 17th 04 07:53 AM |
| Wake Turbulence Question | HankPilot2002 | Piloting | 11 | July 14th 04 05:49 AM |
| caution - wake turbulence | John Harlow | Piloting | 1 | June 4th 04 05:40 PM |
| Wake turbulence avoidance and ATC | Peter R. | Piloting | 24 | December 20th 03 12:40 PM |
| How much turbulence is too much? | Marty Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 21st 03 06:30 PM |