![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I take off in severe clear from O61,
contact approach and request vectors to the ILS at MHR (for multiple approaches). I'm given a freq to squawk and a heading and altitude, followed by "radar contact"... Am I now in the system as an IFR flight? You are not IFR until you hear "N4234J is cleared to MJB via..." or the ilk. If you got that on the ground, you were IFR ("instrument flight RULES") from the getgo, otherwise you are still VFR until you get an actual clearance. "Radar contact" has little or nothing to do with IFR. Once I am over the top of this layer (and this is where I could use some clarification), I am still encountering 3 miles visibility (althought the airport is currently under IMC, and this may be where I'm getting confused), 1000 feet above, 500 feet below and 2000 feet vertical clearance. However, I can't see anything below me and am now flying by reference to instruments alone. You are still VFR, and you are flying visually. You are =navigating= by instruments. So long as you can maintain cloud clearances and visibilities, you are legal to fly under VFR ("visual flight RULES"). It may be however that you are between layers, and have no horizon with which to orient yourself. In this case you are IMC ("Instrument meteorolgical CONDITIONS") while still legal to fly under VFR. If you are not instrument rated, this is dumb. Even if you are instrument rated, this could be dumb. However, it is legal. If you are just above the fog and can control the aircraft visually, you do not log "actual". However if you are between layers and =require= the flight instruments to maintain control (not just navigate), then this is "actual" and should go in the logbook as such. Similarly, over the water, at night, with no moon and nothing to orient yourself, even though it could be severe clear, is "actual". It's legal VFR, and loggable as actual. All of my practice approaches (except for those on a filed IFR flight plan) have been done in VFR, with not a "cleared to....", but after receiving vectors or via pilot nav, a "cleared for the approach". In that case you were operating VFR, and are required (via your safety pilot) to maintain visibility and cloud clearances, and avoid aluminum yourself). If you were practicing in actual conditions, you would hear the magic words "cleared present position to WVS via ..." Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 04:55 AM |
| Good Instructors... | doc | Piloting | 52 | December 5th 04 10:20 PM |
| First Solo In Actual Conditions | David B. Cole | Piloting | 22 | September 4th 04 12:40 AM |
| First Time Buyer - High Time Turbo Arrow | [email protected] | Owning | 21 | July 6th 04 08:30 PM |
| Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 06:34 PM |