A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Discus polar curve at high speeds



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old December 19th 05, 09:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Discus polar curve at high speeds

I'm taking a wild guess here, a hypothesis only...

If you exceed VNE can you divide the failure causes into two families?
Structural and Flutter?

Ok, discount Flutter for the moment and consider only a structural failure.

If you are in moderate dive, the wings still have to support the weight
of the glider and therefore you have higher drag because the wing is at
some positive angle of attack.
However, if you are in a near zero G pushover, the wings are unloaded
vertically and therefore you are at a minimum drag condition from an AoA
standpoint. Then, if there is no flutter, you might get well beyond VNE
before something goes bang..

pondering out loud...



Eric Greenwell wrote:
wrote:

The investigators of this establishment have observed that some metal
parts of the air brakes were bent in the wreck. Bench testing of
these parts indicate that an abrubt extension of the airbrakes at 460
km/h (250 kts) or above can indeed cause the observed bending. For
your information, the Vne of the concerned glider is less than 270
km/h. Surprisingly enough, this accident investigation establishment
is now using this fact as a proof that the pilot did indeed fully
extend the airbrakes at 460 km/h (250 kts).



Have investigators given an opinion about how the pilot was able to
achieve 460 km/h and still had any wings attached before opening the
spoilers? And why he would wait until then to open the spoilers?


I am now trying to help my friend present another proof, which is to
show that a speed of 460 km/h simply was unreachable the given day,
considering weak thermals and fairly low cloud base. However, to
prepare this proof I need some high speed polar data for the Discus,
which has a performance similar to the given glider type.

Best regards

Karl

PS: I would be very interested in having your opinon about the
probability a standard class glider has to survive an abrubt airbrake
extension at 460 km/h (250 kts).



I think most of us are still trying to imagine how a standard class
glider can even get to 460 km/h and be in only one piece.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! Bruce A. Frank Home Built 1 July 4th 04 08:28 PM
Control Reversal in WWII Eunometic Military Aviation 14 June 27th 04 02:03 PM
Cambridge 302 -or- Borgelt B50 plus data logger Romeo Delta Soaring 25 May 30th 04 10:50 AM
AIM-54 Phoenix missile Sujay Vijayendra Military Aviation 89 November 3rd 03 10:47 PM
High Flight NOTAM Kirk Stant Military Aviation 1 September 10th 03 04:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2026 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.