![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Greg Arnold wrote: However, this assumes that thermals are fixed with respect to the airmass. In fact, to stay in a thermal you have to keep moving upwind in relation to the airmass. This means that thermalling will give you some extra distance toward your goal. So you want to spend more time thermalling and less time cruising, which you get by increasing your speed somewhat. How much slower than the airmass do you think the thermals are moving? I don't notice the wind determined by circling to be significantly different than the wind determined by cruising, according to my Cambridge 302. I don't think computers are accurate enough to note the difference, and the difference would be small in any event. Maybe a knot or two. I don't know if the difference is significant enough to affect the way that people fly, but my point was that it is not strictly true that we want to ignore wind speed. And also, why would you get blown out of a thermal? Since you are circling in it, shouldn't you drift at it's speed, instead of the wind speed? No, because you aren't rising as quickly as the air, so you are sinking into air that has left the ground more recently and that hasn't drifted as far downwind. Also, see Todd's comment about wind shear. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The United States Bronze Star Registry | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 04 02:52 AM |
| USA Bronze Badge test. | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 9 | July 17th 04 04:13 PM |
| PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? | Brian | Military Aviation | 77 | August 2nd 03 12:15 PM |