From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago)

Juan proclaimed,
" I think I'll take the opposite approach that you have.
You do that, kiddo. Enjoy.
Question asked and answered. Just because you don't like the answer
doesn't
mean it wasn't. Next!"

Chuck, Juan called me kiddo! I have truly arrived.

Mick

Mick wrote:
Juan proclaimed,
" I think I'll take the opposite approach that you have.
You do that, kiddo. Enjoy.
Question asked and answered. Just because you don't like the answer
doesn't
mean it wasn't. Next!"

Chuck, Juan called me kiddo! I have truly arrived.

Mick

Not until you get a "govern yourself accordingly"

Harry K

You malign a good and decent man when you talk about Tony. He helped so
many people in an incredibly unselfish manner his entire life, the concept
would be totally alien to you.

Kiss my ass you pompous prick.

John "Still around, but lurking" Stricker

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message news:43d9176d$0$9246
Too bad not a single solitary soul accepted to the bar would so much as
consider taking over that case, eh? Hmm. Don't have to be a lawyer to
figure that one out.

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:06:36 -0600, "JStricker" wrote:

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message news:43d9176d$0$9246
Too bad not a single solitary soul accepted to the bar would so much as
consider taking over that case, eh? Hmm. Don't have to be a lawyer to
figure that one out.

Manuel J. Dominguez, of Daves, Whalen, McHale & Considine, P.A. was Tony's
co-attorney in the RAH-15 case. His name is on all the papers Tony filed.

You malign a good and decent man when you talk about Tony. He helped so
many people in an incredibly unselfish manner his entire life, the concept
would be totally alien to you.

In any case, it's a moot point. Tony was the plaintiff in his suit against
Zoom. His death basically ended his suit against Zoom...Manny had no basis to
continue it.

As far as Zoom's suit against the RAH-15, thirteen had already been dismissed by
then. Tony's death left just one co-defendant, Walt Troyer. Walt got dismissed
without lifting a finger when the judge dismissed the entire case due to lack of
prosecution.

http://oris.co.palm-beach.fl.us/or_w...um=20010525885

Note Mr. Dominguez's name.

Zoom did not file to reinstate the suit...my guess is that *his* attorney was a
bit tired of him. As far as I'm aware, Mr. Clager has not represented Zoom in
any case since.

Ron Wanttaja

In article , Ron Wanttaja says...

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:06:36 -0600, "JStricker" wrote:

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message news:43d9176d$0$9246
Too bad not a single solitary soul accepted to the bar would so much as
consider taking over that case, eh? Hmm. Don't have to be a lawyer to
figure that one out.

Manuel J. Dominguez, of Daves, Whalen, McHale & Considine, P.A. was Tony's
co-attorney in the RAH-15 case. His name is on all the papers Tony filed.

The last time I talked to Tony's wife Shirley she said if we ever needed an
attorney in any case involving zoom that Manuel's the guy.She said he knew as
much about zoom as Tony did.
She said we should all pitch in and take zoom on using Manuel.So when I'm ready
Manuel is the guy I'm calling.

So I guess once again jaun is playing with words in saying that "Too bad not a
single solitary soul accepted to the bar would so much as consider taking over
that case, eh? Hmm." He knows that the case ended with Tony's death and the case
is moot. It has nothing to do with the merits of the case. It was a semi nice
try by yawn...But as usual he's good at snippy catty remarks but short on
substance.

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

In article , JStricker says...

Hi John nice to hear from you hope all is well for you.


You malign a good and decent man when you talk about Tony. He helped so
many people in an incredibly unselfish manner his entire life, the concept
would be totally alien to you.

jaun hasn't a clue about Tony except for what zoom told him and as all good
slaves do he listened and obeyed. An ex ANN insider once told me that only 2
names would fire up zoom, mine and Tony's. And for jaun to say that zoom was
shocked by Tony's death was just another attempt to confuse perception with
reality. He tried to created the perception that zoom really felt bad because
Tony died when the reality was he was shocked at the death because he was off
the hook.



Kiss my ass you pompous prick.


Well said John

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

In article .com, Mick says...

Juan proclaimed,
" I think I'll take the opposite approach that you have.
You do that, kiddo. Enjoy.
Question asked and answered. Just because you don't like the answer
doesn't
mean it wasn't. Next!"

Chuck, Juan called me kiddo! I have truly arrived.


Congratulations on your first "jauning" keep it up. Now if you ask zoom the same
questions ,soon you'll be the recipient of a whole host of threats such as ,
"authorities have been notified" ,"I'm contacting my attorneys in the morning"
and the mother of all threats "govern yourself accordingly" Then you will have
earned the distinction of being a part of the "gaggle". Semper Fi

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

LOL! You're kidding! Oh, man, sorry about that. Any other recipes you want
to try improving, or have you decided you've pushed your luck far enough?

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:yF9Cf.3554$ie3.3548@trndny09...
Does that mean there is only one correct answer?

BTW, my wife is ****ed off at me for 'improving' her flan by following
your
aluminium foil suggestion.

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message news:43d91536$0$9235

Question asked and answered. Just because you don't like the answer
doesn't
mean it wasn't. Next!

"anon" wrote in message
newsheCf.727134$x96.425963@attbi_s72...

Juan,

Why don't you ask Jim? He knows the magazine and probably recalls the
phone call.

Because it's your story, and your fear.

There is no doubt that the Pilot editor forwarded my email or significant
portions of it to Jim, as he quoted it verbatim when he called me.

And did you ask him why he did that?

Juan, you are quite the journalist, researcher, and IT professional aren't
you? In thirty seconds you could have found that the magazine was likely
to be one of two popular magazines, then a search of "Pilot magazine zoom"
would have revealed the answer and led you to my earlier post and other
posts about Jim's short tenure as a Pilot contributor.

Had I had the slightest interest, maybe. I don't.

You are known by the company you keep, Juan. Do you think your
association with Jim has helped or hurt your reputation in journalism,
aviation, or aviation journalism?

Among those in the industry who count for something, it has helped. Made a
lot of friends, met a lot of new people, helped a lot of people by
publicizing the existence of some really good products made by companies and
people who deserved the publicity, and never killed anyone in the process,
which is more than people around here can claim.

"JStricker" wrote in message
...
You malign a good and decent man when you talk about Tony. He helped so
many people in an incredibly unselfish manner his entire life, the concept
would be totally alien to you.

Kiss my ass you pompous prick.

John "Still around, but lurking" Stricker

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message news:43d9176d$0$9246
Too bad not a single solitary soul accepted to the bar would so much as
consider taking over that case, eh? Hmm. Don't have to be a lawyer to
figure that one out.

Get Chuck to do it, he's always good for that.

Besides, I had some good, long talks with Tony. We disagreed on a lot of
things, but at least he was enough of a man to recognize that and leave it
at that, which is more than I can say about some pitiful excuses for males
of the species who crawl the gutters around here.