Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Orval Fairbairn wrote in
news
In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

(snipped)

With your comment above, you are obiviously associating 9/11 Truth
with silly conspiracy theories. Doing this is a predetermination of
where you're beliefs will be. You cannot argue with science. And if
you dispute it, you obviously didn't look into it


*WE* are not arguing with science! It is "TRUTH" who is and is losing
-- badly!

1) "TRUTH" posits a crackpot professor's idea and claims that it has
been peer reviewed. It has -- but the good professor's peers reject
the story.

2) "TRUTH" posts in aviation newsgroups seeking validation for his (or
some other crackpot's) contention that the hijackers couldn't have
flown the 757s into the buildings and gets 100% response that they
could have done it.

3) "TRUTH" posits that no plane struck the Pentagon -- Purdue
University shows the complete engineering analysis of what happened
when the lane hit the Pentagon.

It is time for "TRUTH", "EagleEye", "Emmanuel Goldstein" and all the
rest of their ilk to go away and hide in their caves in Afghanistan,
with their buddies bin Laden and Zawahiri and await the next B-1 full
of deep penetrators which they all richly deserve.




You are proving yourself to be the idiot. You have not explained ANY of
the scientific evidence. Scienctific laws CANNOT be changed. But since
you think they can be, perhaps you believe in Martians too?

"TRUTH" is starting to sound like "Brad Guth," who denies the lunar
landing.

BTW, I neither believe nor disbelieve in extraterrestrials, but I *do*
believe in crackpots (see above)!

The scientific facts are that a bunch of savage Wahabbi radicals
hijacked four airliners, killed the crews and proceeded to fly two of
them into the WTC and another into the Pentagon.

The plane that hit the WTC each packed several kilotons equivalent
energy which caused major structural degradation, then the subsequent
fire of 50+ tons of jet fuel, further degraded the structures until they
collapsed.

That sums up the engineering analysis of WTC. The plane that hit the
Pentagon effectively hit a very hard wall, disintegrated and burned up.
Pieces of steel were found at the site, along with minor external damage
at the site.

The passengers on the fourth plane, hearing about the first two, decided
to do something about it and overpowered some of the hijackers. The
hijackers in the cockpit either broke the plane in midair or dived it
into the ground, killing all aboard.

Now, what part of the facts doesn't "TRUTH" understand?