|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
February 25th 06, 12:15 PM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
Thomas Borchert wrote in
: Truth, How many times do you need to have it explained to you that there was no need for any of them to be instrument trained ? Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating. Graham At 30,000 feet it does No. Take it from the experts. They are here in this group. The only purpos of an instrument rating on a clear day at 30,000 feet is to be legal. A terrorist couldn't care less. Okay, I admit I don't have the qualifications for this. What I do know is what an aeronautical engineer has said. (He's also qualified to fly large aircralf.) I consider him an expert. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 03:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 11:09 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 09:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 04:38 AM |
Threaded Mode