![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter Duniho wrote: "Dr. Anthony J. Lomenzo" wrote in message ... [...] anyway --- more than once, literally, I program the thing for FS2K2 and FS9 only to come back to it upon machine restart .... and the programming is gone! Am I missing something? Further, and perhaps this is unique only to myself [translation: op error in re not knowing how to use it properly!], I find the quadrant is 'very', how shall I say, sensitive to sensitivity settings, so what's your take, if you use the quadrant yourself of course, on a sort of compromise quadrant sensitivity and null area setting(s)? And do you advise the simple or advanced settings for best results? Hi Doc...nice to see you on Usenet again. As far as your problem goes, I'm afraid I have no personal experience with the flight controls you're using. I'll offer comments, but they'll have to be very general, and you should take anything I write with a grain of salt (good advice anyway ).With respect to control sensitivity, it seems to me that you want no null area at all for engine and prop controls. A null area implies a region of control movement through which nothing happens, which is appropriate for a flight control (especially one simulating tension-cable operated control surfaces found in many real airplanes), but would not be for power controls (which usually have a fairly immediate response, and in any case don't really have an idea of a "centered" position, which is where the null area is). For the sensitivity itself, you want the power controls to map their full range of motion to the full range of power settings available. I don't really know how this translates to the settings for the power quadrant you're using, but I suspect you want whatever is the "normal" sensitivity. That is, something that is basically a 1-to-1 mapping. Generally speaking, increasing sensitivity means that smaller movements of the control result in a given change in the actual parameter (throttle, prop, etc), while decreasing sensitivity means that larger movements of the control result in a given change. Put another way, this means that at higher sensitivities than the default, the maximum change in the parameter occurs before the control reaches the end of its throw, while at lower sensitivities, you may not be able to obtain the full range of parameter values even with full-stop movement of the control. IMHO, neither extreme is desirable, so for power controls, you just want the normal sensitivity. Finally, the first question: why don't your settings get saved? What might cause that depends on a variety of things, and I can't say for sure why it might be happening. But the first thing that comes to mind is that you may be running MSFS without administrator privileges (which is actually a good thing thing to do, except that it can cause headaches like this "can't save control settings" problem), except that you haven't given non-admin accounts on your computer access to the install directory for MSFS (where user settings are stored). Of course, if this were the problem, then other changes to user settings (like default flights, flight plans, etc.) would probably not work either. If you otherwise have no problems with settings being saved, and only the control settings are causing problems, then I'm not sure what to suggest. You may still want to verify that you have write-access privileges to the configuration file where the user settings are stored, just in case. If it's a file privileges issue, then the fix is simple: just look at the security settings for the install directory for MSFS (under the "Program Files" directory), and give "Full Control" access to the "Users" group. You can get to the security settings by right-clicking on the install folder, choosing the "Properties" menu item, and then clicking on the "Security" tab of that dialog. If that doesn't help, I'm afraid I am out of ideas at the moment. I do hope that there's something helpful in all of the above. ![]() Pete Peter ... I owe you! As luck would have it, my son was over the house when your message came in, he read it, applied the recommendations, and the quadrant works like a charm! Ditto the yoke and some finer [read: now understood] sensitivity/null zone adjustments. I must say that when I first got it [CH throttle quadrant] and tried it and this without even touching [and to fully confess, only half understanding the whole business of null zones and sensitivity issues which you have now very non technically explained!] the sensitivities box in 'either' 2K or 2K2, the DC-3 [*I'm still a great fan ever since FS98 of the Roy Chaffin, et al, DC-3, a magnificent creation that series for '98, 2K and 2K2!]-- anyway, with my own tinkerings and again not even bothering with the sensitivity/null zone boxes, the DC-3 acted as if the thing was suddenly possessed and went into high RPM while literally doing a 180 and dancing off the runway at KCGX Meigs and into the drink forthwith! Whew! Then, I 'tinkered' with the settings, well, when I say 'tinkering' of the wholly uninformed variety, hey, I might as well have tried taking off from Meigs [!] in that classic monster Convair B-36 'Peacekeeper' bomber ... fully loaded. With the same result therein! 'Drink city' once again and quite similar to my virtual 'helo' experiences ... as Al Smith would duly attest! Thank you , Peter. Much appreciated the helping-hand. I think it's one of the things that makes the sim community, indeed, even the real McCoy flight community itself, what it is! I don't think there is any such thing as going it totally alone ... real or virtual ... and one always benefits from another and they, in turn, from someone else who has been there, done that type of thing and even those types no doubt got their savvy from someone and/or have to seek the helping hand when necessary as new [or baffling!] technology comes up! Thanks again! Doc Tony |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UK planning to evict N-registered aircraft | George Patterson | Instrument Flight Rules | 67 | September 1st 05 09:04 AM |
| UK planning to evict N-registered aircraft | Juan Jimenez | Owning | 37 | September 1st 05 09:04 AM |
| Cross Country the main focus of soaring? | mat Redsell | Soaring | 77 | October 18th 04 11:40 PM |
| US cross country flight | S Narayan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 7th 04 03:58 PM |
| US cross country flight | S Narayan | Piloting | 0 | January 7th 04 03:58 PM |