If WTC 7 came down from fire and debris ..

TRUTH wrote:
" wrote in
oups.com:

TRUTH wrote:
then why did the leaseholder say....


"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe
the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to
pull and we watched the building collapse
Because he had decide to abandon any attempt to preserve the
building and was willing to pull any efforts to do so.


"Pull" is an industry term that means professionally demolish, as is
confirmed by this clip from the same PBS documentary:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/vide.../pull_wtc6.wmv


No matter how you spin it neither the leaseholder nor the fire chief
were in the demolition business so what they meant is not likely the
same thing.



http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/wtc7_pbs.WMV

WTC 7, a 47 story steel framed building built in 1987, collapsed
completely, near freefall speed.
That's how they tend to collapse.


When taken down by pre-positioned explosives.

Which you still haven't explained HOW they got there, who did it nor
how preparations, taking weeks, were made without anyone noticing. You
have to be able to explain that if you want us to believe there was a
demolition such as you keep trying to foist on us.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired