A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

strength calculations for a step



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 06, 05:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default strength calculations for a step

Ernest Christley wrote:
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote:
"Ernest Christley" wrote in message
...
...

My biggest concern is the inside tube not being strong enough and
taking a slight bend over time. Then it will no longer slide. Hence
my question. If it were a straight beam, I think I could run the
calculations, but how do you analyze it when the cantilevered beam
isn't straight?


Divide the load in to two componants - the load normal to the beam
(bending force) and the load parallel to the beam (tension). The
compression load on the bottom face of the beam will be somewhat
reduced by the tension and the tension load on the top face will be
somewhat increased and the sides of your box will carry shear plus
tension.

If your beam is 40 degrees from vertical, the bending force would be
the load (I think you mentioned 300 pounds) times the sine of the
angle and the tension force would be 30 times the cosine of the angle
(I'll let you do the math). (assuming, of course, that I am drawing
the picture correctly in my head) It would be reasonable to assume
that the tension force is carried by the entire cross section of the
square tube so divide the force by the cross section ((width + height)
* thickness) and add that stress to whatever stresses you come up with
from the bending.

Or, you could clamp the bar in a vice and jump up and down on it.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader.


Todd was correct. I was talking about the support beam and not the
step. The step actually sticks out forward from the support beam. I
apologize for not being completely clear.

I'm going to work on the calculation, just for schnitz and giggles, but
took the suggestion to heart and rigged up a test stand by nailing a
couple of blocks to the side of a sawhorse so that the outer housing was
supported at the points where it will be welded. Bounced as hard as I
could in the unstable situation, and could not detect any flexing. That
was with junk mild steel that I was using for a mock-up. I think I
might have overbuilt it by just a tad 8*)

This is the last piece to go on the airframe before the fabric.


A little flexing isn't all that bad. The retractable ladder on F-4E
flexed quite a bit yet had no trouble supporting my 220 pounds plus
anything I was carrying.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money [email protected] Owning 1 January 16th 05 06:48 AM
Garmin 430 and Comm Strength - Solved! Marco Leon Owning 0 December 17th 04 05:15 PM
Garmin 430 and Comm Strength - Solved! Marco Leon Piloting 0 December 17th 04 05:15 PM
Re; What do you think? Kelsibutt Naval Aviation 0 September 29th 03 06:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.