![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ernest Christley wrote:
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote: "Ernest Christley" wrote in message ... ... My biggest concern is the inside tube not being strong enough and taking a slight bend over time. Then it will no longer slide. Hence my question. If it were a straight beam, I think I could run the calculations, but how do you analyze it when the cantilevered beam isn't straight? Divide the load in to two componants - the load normal to the beam (bending force) and the load parallel to the beam (tension). The compression load on the bottom face of the beam will be somewhat reduced by the tension and the tension load on the top face will be somewhat increased and the sides of your box will carry shear plus tension. If your beam is 40 degrees from vertical, the bending force would be the load (I think you mentioned 300 pounds) times the sine of the angle and the tension force would be 30 times the cosine of the angle (I'll let you do the math). (assuming, of course, that I am drawing the picture correctly in my head) It would be reasonable to assume that the tension force is carried by the entire cross section of the square tube so divide the force by the cross section ((width + height) * thickness) and add that stress to whatever stresses you come up with from the bending. Or, you could clamp the bar in a vice and jump up and down on it. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. Todd was correct. I was talking about the support beam and not the step. The step actually sticks out forward from the support beam. I apologize for not being completely clear. I'm going to work on the calculation, just for schnitz and giggles, but took the suggestion to heart and rigged up a test stand by nailing a couple of blocks to the side of a sawhorse so that the outer housing was supported at the points where it will be welded. Bounced as hard as I could in the unstable situation, and could not detect any flexing. That was with junk mild steel that I was using for a mock-up. I think I might have overbuilt it by just a tad 8*) This is the last piece to go on the airframe before the fabric. A little flexing isn't all that bad. The retractable ladder on F-4E flexed quite a bit yet had no trouble supporting my 220 pounds plus anything I was carrying. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | January 16th 05 06:48 AM |
Garmin 430 and Comm Strength - Solved! | Marco Leon | Owning | 0 | December 17th 04 05:15 PM |
Garmin 430 and Comm Strength - Solved! | Marco Leon | Piloting | 0 | December 17th 04 05:15 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |