A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AMT question: Approved Data



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 26th 06, 10:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMT question: Approved Data

Ackshully, you would need an appropriately rated pilot for return to
service. You'd need an IA to approve the engine for return to service. And
yes, the pilot is supposed to make an engine log entry.


I agree with you that the IA approves the engine for return to service, and
the pilot actually returns it to service. But what's your reference for
stating that the pilot is supposed to make a logbook entry? I'm not aware of
any such requirement in Part 43.


  #2  
Old March 26th 06, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMT question: Approved Data

Look in Part 91

Title 14: Aeronautics and Space
PART 91-GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES
Subpart E-Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, and
Alterations


Browse Previous | Browse Next


§ 91.407 Operation after maintenance, preventive
maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration.
(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone
maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or
alteration unless-

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person
authorized under §43.7 of this chapter; and

(2) The maintenance record entry required by §43.9 or
§43.11, as applicable, of this chapter has been made.

(b) No person may carry any person (other than crewmembers)
in an aircraft that has been maintained, rebuilt, or altered
in a manner that may have appreciably changed its flight
characteristics or substantially affected its operation in
flight until an appropriately rated pilot with at least a
private pilot certificate flies the aircraft, makes an
operational check of the maintenance performed or alteration
made, and logs the flight in the aircraft records.

(c) The aircraft does not have to be flown as required by
paragraph (b) of this section if, prior to flight, ground
tests, inspection, or both show conclusively that the
maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or
alteration has not appreciably changed the flight
characteristics or substantially affected the flight
operation of the aircraft.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under
control number 2120-0005)

Browse Previous | Browse Next

"Barry" wrote in message
...
| Ackshully, you would need an appropriately rated pilot
for return to
| service. You'd need an IA to approve the engine for
return to service. And
| yes, the pilot is supposed to make an engine log entry.
|
| I agree with you that the IA approves the engine for
return to service, and
| the pilot actually returns it to service. But what's your
reference for
| stating that the pilot is supposed to make a logbook
entry? I'm not aware of
| any such requirement in Part 43.
|
|


  #3  
Old March 27th 06, 01:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMT question: Approved Data

Jim Macklin wrote:

snip
(b) No person may carry any person (other than crewmembers)
in an aircraft that has been maintained, rebuilt, or altered
in a manner that may have appreciably changed its flight
characteristics or substantially affected its operation in
flight until an appropriately rated pilot with at least a
private pilot certificate flies the aircraft, makes an
operational check of the maintenance performed or alteration
made, and logs the flight in the aircraft records.


So what happened to the idea that the person who signed the maintenance out
comes for the ride?

--

regards

jc

LEGAL - I don't believe what I wrote and neither should you. Sobriety and/or
sanity of the author is not guaranteed

EMAIL - and are not valid email
addresses. news2x at perentie is valid for a while.
  #4  
Old March 30th 06, 04:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMT question: Approved Data

"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
(c) The aircraft does not have to be flown as required by
paragraph (b) of this section if, prior to flight, ground
tests, inspection, or both show conclusively that the
maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or
alteration has not appreciably changed the flight
characteristics or substantially affected the flight
operation of the aircraft.


The last chapter of the Lycoming opposed engine overhaul manual specifies
that the rebuilt engine must be run in a calibrated test cell. That shows
conclusively that the flight characteristics won't be substantially
affected. Therefore, who needs the pilot?

Incidentally, and don't ask me how I know, does everyone here with an
overhauled cetificated engine have a record of a test cell run in the
engine's overhaul records?

Now then, I seem to remember something about integral superchargered engines
needing to be overhauled by an approved facility. When I ran R-985s, we had
to send them out as we weren't allowed to overhaul them ourselves.

D.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
More IFR with VFR GPS questions Chris Quaintance Instrument Flight Rules 58 November 30th 05 08:39 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics Brian Sandle General Aviation 43 February 24th 04 12:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.