A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old May 3rd 06, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE

On Tue, 02 May 2006 21:10:36 GMT, Jose
wrote:

I think it's 60% less by volume, but it is clean burning.


How much gas does it take to run the farm equipment to generate the corn
in the first place?


It depends on whos figures/studies and results you are willing to
believe. There is a tremendous amount of information out there, in
libraries, text books, and on the Internet and there is less agreement
in it than with the causes of global warming.

"Near as I can tell" it takes the equivalent of one gallon of ethanol
through the growth, harvest, and production cycle to produce roughly
a gallon and a half of product. That is a very small, net energy gain
and far from putting ethanol into a economically competitive position
as an alternative fuel regardless of claims. Also the entire chain is
heavily subsidized along with tax breaks which makes some of the
figures even more suspect.

You can spend hours looking over the results of studies that show
everything from about a 25 to 30% net energy loss to a very large net
energy gain, but nothing about the parameters used in those studies
and the studies mean nothing unless you can see what they took into
consideration. Having raised corn and still owning a small farm which
I rent out, I can say with certainty the study that showed a large net
energy gain had to have left out a lot of items in the cycle that use
a lot of energy. Corn is heavily dependent on growing conditions as
well as herbicides and pesticides. Dry years and wet years make for
lean years. It also takes a lot out of the soil which has to recover
several years before the next crop of corn.

But is it clean burning... wait... I said that before, but it is clean
burning. Actually it'll clean out an engine that's pretty badly
carboned up.

I do think is it a better choice in most cases than MTBE, but
unfortunately not when used in aircraft systems.

In Michigan we have the added problem that they no longer have to
place stickers on the pumps telling what's in the gas. The stickers
only state that the gas meets such and such a standard which may or
may not include ethanol. I believe Michigan has used ethanol from the
"get-go" and not MTBE as we've had Gasohol since the 70's. It took off
in the 70's but a number of the producers went under shortly after the
gas prices went back down. I know of no processes that were turning
in a net energy gain back then.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com



Jose

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ethanol mogas john smith Owning 16 May 2nd 06 02:30 PM
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... Jay Honeck Home Built 82 May 19th 05 03:49 PM
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... Jay Honeck Owning 87 May 19th 05 03:49 PM
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil Victor Owning 4 March 30th 05 10:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.