![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just looked for that feature, Andrew, and couldn't find it. Could you
give us a little more detail on where it is? Jim "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... Airnav has a feature where you can search airports between two user-specified radii. However, the maximum radius appears to be 200NM. So, you can search airports between 100NM and 200NM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RST Engineering" wrote in message
... I just looked for that feature, Andrew, and couldn't find it. Could you give us a little more detail on where it is? You can use the full form at: http://www.airnav.com/airports/search.html That's the form you get if you click on the "Advanced Search" button on the "Airports" page. Interestingly, the range options don't update when you change the units (km, nm, or sm). Of course, that doesn't help here, since a nautical mile is the longest unit available. But it means people wanting to work in km (for example) are getting short-changed. ![]() There's a shorter version here where you can enter the distances as text, rather than picking from a list: http://www.airnav.com/cgi-bin/airport-search Unfortunately, the range limit isn't just in the form UI itself; it appears that the CGI script enforces it too. If you enter a distance more than 200NM, a form comes back to get you to enter the distance again. I'm guessing they do this in order to limit the work the database has to do (as the range goes up, the number of potential hits goes up dramatically). It is kind of ironic, given the regulatory requirement for a 200NM leg, that 200NM would be the upper bound for their search. I suspect there's achance that if someone sent them some email and explained why 300 or 400 NM might be more useful to people doing the cross-country selection for a pilot certificate, they might increase the limit. Now, all that said... I did a 100-200NM search from my home airport, and even with the shorter distance, 86 airports showed up. Limiting that to paved airports with fuel cut that in half, but it's still clear that a 200-300NM search (covering an area almost twice as great) is going to produce a very large number of choices. I'd say that a pure radius-based search may not really be as useful as one might hope...it's better to start with at least an idea of a general direction or destination, and using a chart makes this sort of search easy. As for the the WAC not being available...I'm not sure why the WAC was mentioned specifically. All of my certificate-requirement long-cross-country flights were doable on a single sectional. Even if one doesn't have a WAC handy (and frankly, this is a good example of why you ought to buy one at least once...they can be very useful), the sectional chart that every pilot ought to have handy should be sufficient. Pete |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RST Engineering wrote:
I just looked for that feature, Andrew, and couldn't find it. Could you give us a little more detail on where it is? Jim "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... Airnav has a feature where you can search airports between two user-specified radii. However, the maximum radius appears to be 200NM. So, you can search airports between 100NM and 200NM. Check out the link to aeroplanner than Steven posted. Looks to be much better than Airnav in this regard at least. Matt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 10:39 PM |
| Palo Alto airport, potential long-term problems... | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | June 7th 05 12:32 AM |
| Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 07:05 PM |
| Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 18 | July 14th 04 07:05 PM |