![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:16:21 -0700, Sam Spade
wrote: Roger wrote: On 9 Jun 2006 17:04:28 -0700, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: The 396 has some advantages and disadvantages when compared to airborne RADAR. Starting with the good, it does not have the blind spots you will find from time to time in airborne RADAR caused by absorption in heavy precipitation which can hide some nasty stuff. OTOH if you keep in mind that the display is probably 5 minutes old or a tad more AND you have been following it you can pick your course. All systems have their limitations, including airborne weather radar. That is the reason that the prudent operation of airborne weather radar requires minimim avoidance distances, depending upon altitude and weather the outside air temp is above freezing. The limitation you cite indeed exists but can be avoided through use of distance-to-avoid parameters and not pushing the envelope to get the But again in the context of the OP it takes experience to realize these things exist. When you see a line and particularly a bow that starts out green on your side, then yellow and then red followed by nothing it's time to go some where else. That is no guarantee that sever weather exists behind that line but it's a good indicator. Like you and others have said, being conservative, using all available information, and education are the important items. mission accomplished, so to speak. The EAL wind shear crash at JFK, the Delta L-1011 wind shear crash at DFW, and the Soutern Airways DC-9 crash in southern Georgia all happaned when penetration rather than avoidance was attempted.. When this stuff can take the "big boys" down the smaller stuff should be some where else entirely. The ideal setup in high-end aircraft today is airborne radar with the largest feasible antenna and piped in weather radar for planning purposes. The latter doesn't work in much of the world, though, just like the 396 won't provide weather outside the 48 states. There are areas where it won't do that good a job inside the US either, but for the most part it can be a very useful tool, particularly when used in conjunction with other available information. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 02:16 AM |
| Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 5th 04 12:55 AM |
| Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 04:41 AM |
| FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 01:07 AM |