![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is impossible to tell from the information you give, and even if you did,
I'd want to SEE the airplane. Both airplanes probably have "cores" for engines. The one with the 25 year overhaul for sure. Look at the guy's car....................You can just about tell EVERYTHING about his airplane from the condition of his car. Karl "Curator" N185KG PS: I practice what I preach. I bought my 185 virtually sight unseen. You need to move FAST on a good airplane/deal or else someone else will snatch it up from under your eyes. Good airplanes/deals don't last! wrote in message oups.com... Hey folks, I'm trying to decide which is preferable, a relatively low time plane with missing logs or a higher time of the same model with all logs. The first is a 65-year old plane with 1800 ttaf and 346 tsmoh. It's missing the airframe logs from 1986 and older. The other has about 3000 ttaf and about 950 on a 25 year old overhaul. All logs present. Both planes have Continental 65s and are the same price. All input appreciated. Thanks, Mike |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 04:55 AM |
| The Accumulated Time Scoring System | hannu | Soaring | 1 | December 15th 05 01:24 PM |
| Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 03:24 PM |
| Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 08:28 PM |
| 152 with high time lycoming | Dave | Owning | 1 | June 27th 04 07:20 AM |