A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 06, 06:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"mark" wrote

It is not the full medical. I wouldn't be getting peoples hopes up if I
wasn't positive.

The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight
restrictions on the pilots. Those restrictions most certainly lower the
risks of flight involved to others. The procedure is in place, but must

be
requested if it was not done so with the request of the class 3. A class

3
request does not automatically call for a review for light sport
qualifications. Once requested, the FAA can review the file and then
make

a
determination as to his or her safety based on the lower performance of

the
aircraft and the lower demands on the pilot for the slower airplanes.


How did you find out about this procedure? Do you know anyone who has
been
successful with the review?

If this is a viable procedure, there must be a written record, as to how
it
is done, what it's limitations and requirements are, ect. The FAA does
not
do anything that is not on paper. Can you point to a reg., circular, or
something on paper?

Anyone else out there ever hear of this?

I, for one, am still skeptical, but would *love* to be proven wrong, by
seeing it in print, in a government record.

Thanks for keeping this as a civil discussion.
--
Jim in NC

Jim one of the issues with this type of procedure is that its a case by case
basis. I did the research a while back because of my own health issues.
They are still new so as I said they are not in 67 yet. They should be LSA
information or the Aviation Medical Examiners manual. It will be several
days for me to dig it out. It really isn't anything more than they do on
any other medical. It is effectively a special issuance for the ability to
fly LSA. I gave the AOPA number in a previous post. Don't take my word for
it. Call them yourself.

It is very possible that this request might have been done for the orginal
poster with the inital application. Its also possible it wasn't. Only he
would know and its none of our business the nature of the medical issue.
Anyone that wants to fly that bad and is willing to press his medical that
far, is someone I hope can be safe, approved and legal.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11 Wake UP! Piloting 184 April 7th 06 04:05 AM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11 Frank F. Matthews Piloting 26 March 1st 06 12:13 AM
FA: Book - Aircraft Materials and Processes by Titterton Pub 1937 Brad Aviation Marketplace 0 November 21st 05 01:59 AM
Defining Composites (long) B Lacovara Soaring 1 September 13th 03 08:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.