A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 31st 06, 11:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
RST,

Warbirds, you are not welcome at Oshkosh.


Great idea. GA is small enough to be threatened from all sides, so we
should definitely start the in-fighting and make it even smaller by
ourselves. Yep. Sounds great. For the airlines.


Who wants warbirds?! Warbirds aren't relevant anymore. Nobody cares
about warbirds. That's why everybody must go to Chino's Planes of Fame, the
Boeing Museum of Flight, the McMinnville Air Museum, Duxford, etc to look at
the Citations and Pipers parked over in the GA side...

It ain't a Lancaster or a Flying Fortress they want to see. It's the new
Cessna....

-c
(If I want to look at a bunch of people's private airplanes, I'll save my
money and hang out at the FBO.)


  #2  
Old August 1st 06, 09:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh

Gatt,

I agree with you.

It's the new
Cessna....


There was no new Cessna. There was a "proof of concept". Google
"vaporware"...

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old August 2nd 06, 01:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
.Blueskies.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 249
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ...
: Gatt,
:
: I agree with you.
:
: It's the new
: Cessna....
:
: There was no new Cessna. There was a "proof of concept". Google
: "vaporware"...
:
: --
: Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
:

Didn't see the 'cirrus killer' shots?


  #4  
Old August 2nd 06, 08:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh

Blueskies.,

Didn't see the 'cirrus killer' shots?


Yep. As I said: a "proof of concept" in Cessna's own words.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #5  
Old August 3rd 06, 01:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
.Blueskies.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 249
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ...
: Blueskies.,
:
: Didn't see the 'cirrus killer' shots?
:
:
: Yep. As I said: a "proof of concept" in Cessna's own words.
:
: --
: Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
:

You said vaporware - vaporware doesn't fly, maybe a vaporplane...


  #6  
Old August 3rd 06, 08:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh

Blueskies.,

You said vaporware - vaporware doesn't fly, maybe a vaporplane...


Something flew, yes. Was it a product from Cessna? Hardly.

Vaporware in my book is something you demo to great effect but with
nothing even remotely approaching a finished product in sight, let
alone a firm date for a finished product "on the shelves". Often, the
purpose is to keep the impressed masses from buying an available
product from the competition while playing catch-up with that
competition after you have badly dropped the ball.

IMHO, what Cessna did qualifies fully and in all aspects.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #7  
Old August 3rd 06, 02:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 407
Default Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Blueskies.,

You said vaporware - vaporware doesn't fly, maybe a vaporplane...


Something flew, yes. Was it a product from Cessna? Hardly.

Vaporware in my book is something you demo to great effect but with
nothing even remotely approaching a finished product in sight, let
alone a firm date for a finished product "on the shelves". Often, the
purpose is to keep the impressed masses from buying an available
product from the competition while playing catch-up with that
competition after you have badly dropped the ball.

IMHO, what Cessna did qualifies fully and in all aspects.


I think many would disagree with your definition.

Vaporware to most, is a plan, some nice specifications, and some 3-D cad
pictures. Have the computer crash, and what do you have to show for your
airplane? Nothing. Vapor!
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oshkosh Reflections Jay Honeck Home Built 54 August 16th 05 09:24 PM
Oshkosh Reflections Jay Honeck Owning 44 August 7th 05 02:31 PM
Oshkosh Reflections Jay Honeck Piloting 45 August 7th 05 02:31 PM
Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? Paul Restoration 0 July 11th 04 04:17 AM
How I got to Oshkosh (long) Doug Owning 2 August 18th 03 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.